Baghchand S/O Nathulal v. the State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Bench rejected bail application where petitioner had impugned orders in another case with pendency of pronounced bail. Held that enlargement would aid another criminal. Adjourned with token plea accepted.
What the court decided
[2026:RJ-JP:2582]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 762/2026
Baghchand S/o Nathulal, R/o Village Indoli, Tahseel Aarai, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Bundi).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brahmanand Sandu Mr. Parth Sarthi Sandu For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishiraj Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
21/01/2026
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail application under Section 439 CrPC should be allowed given the petitioner’s pending bail trial?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Baghchand S/o Nathulal
- respondent
The State Of Rajasthan
Coram
Praveer Bhatnagar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/762/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court