Allowed

Sameta Kumari D/O Shri Asuram Vishnoi W/O Late Ramesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Jan 2026CRLMB/15401/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second regular bail application by a female sub-inspector (trainee) accused of cheating and conspiracy in an SOG examination-fraud case involving impersonation. The court, invoking the Supreme Court's guidance on releasing women accused with dependent children, allowed bail subject to bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail upon personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two reliable sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, subject to appearance before trial court.

Sameta Kumari D/O Shri Asuram Vishnoi W/O Late Ramesh… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:1964]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2^nd Bail Application No. 15401/2025

¶4

Sameta Kumari D/o Shri Asuram Vishnoi W/o Late Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Dawal, Police Station Chitallwana, District Jalore, Presently R/o Sewada Police Station Chitallwana, District Jalore, At Present Working As Sub Inspector (Trainee), Police Commissionerate, Jodhpur (At Present Confined in Women Cell Jaipur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Rajni Vyas, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anurag Sharma, SPP with Mr. Anoop Meena, Adv. Mr. Saleh Mohammad, Dy.S.P. (SOG)

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI

¶11

Order

¶12

16/01/2026

¶13

izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ¼/kkjk 439 na-iz-la-½ iqfyl Fkkuk Lis'ky iqfyl LVs'ku ¼,l-vks-th-½] ftyk ,Vh,l ,oa ,lvksth esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 10@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 419] 420] 120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o /kkjk 4] 5] 6 jktLFkku lkoZtfud ijh{kk ¼vuqfpr lk/ku dk iz;ksx½ vf/kfu;e rFkk /kkjk 66D lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh ¼la'kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

[CRLMB-15401/2025]

[2026:RJ-JP:1964]

(2 of 4)

izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk dk izFke tekur izkFkZuk i= bl U;k;ky; }kjk vkns'k fnukad 04-11-2025 ds ek/;e ls foLr`r vkns'k ikfjr dj vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k x;k FkkA

¶18

izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk fnukad 12-05-2025 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgh gS] mlds fo#) vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] /kkjk 27 Hkkjrh; lk{; vf/kfu;e dh lwpuk ds vk/kkj ij mls vfHk;qDr cuk;k x;k gS] mlds fo#) dksbZ cjkenxh 'ks"k ugha gS] mldk dksbZ iwoZ vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ ugha jgk gSA izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk ds 11 o"khZ; iq= eksfgr gS] tks mldh lkl ds ikl jgrk gS] izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk dh lkl :ik nsoh dh vksj ls 'kiFk i= Hkh izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk ds U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa jgus ls og vius iq= eksfgr dh ns[kHkky ugha dj ik jgh gS vkSj bl dkj.k mldk nkf[kyk Nk=kokl esa djok;k x;k gSA izdj.k esa vHkh vkjksi fojfpr ugh gq, gSa] djhc 100 lk{khx.k ds c;ku ys[kc) gksus gSa] vr% izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj mls tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa dSyk'k dqekj cuke jktLFkku jkT; ,dyihB vkijkf/kd fofo/k tekur izkFkZuk i= la[;k 14584@2025 o vU; lesfdr izdj.kksa esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 08-01-2026 dh izfr izLrqr dhA

¶19

fo}ku fo'ks"k yksd vfHk;kstd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk ds LFkku ij 10 yk[k #i;s esa lgvfHk;qDrk laxhrk fo'uksbZ }kjk fyf[kr ijh{kk nh x;h Fkh vkSj bl dkj.k izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk fo/kok dksVs ls mi&fujh{kd ds in ij p;fur gqbZA vr%

¶20

[2026:RJ-JP:1964]

¶21

(3 of 4) [CRLMB-15401/2025]

¶22

izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk ij vkjksfir vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkosA

¶23

eSaus mHk; i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶24

orZeku izdj.k esa izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk efgyk gS] og fnukad 12-05-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgh gS] mlds fo#) vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] vkjksi fojfpr fd;k tkuk 'ks"k gS] izdj.k esa djhc 100 lk{khx.k ds c;ku ys[kc) gksus gSaA izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk dk 11 o"khZ; iq= eksfgr gksuk mldh lkl :ik nsoh us vius 'kiFk i= esa crk;k gSA izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk ds U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa jgus ls mlds iq= dh mfpr ns[kHkky o ikyu&iks"k.k ugha gks ikuk crk;k x;k gSA

¶25

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Satender Kumar Antil Vs Central Bureau of Investigation [(2022) 10 SCC 51] esa ;g fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd%&

¶26

"69. Proviso to Section 437 of the Code mandates that when the accused is under the age of sixteen years, sick or infirm or being a woman, is something which is required to be taken note of. Obviously, the court has to satisfy itself that the accused person is sick or infirm. In a case pertaining to women, the court is expected to show some sensitivity. We have already taken note of the fact that many women who commit cognizable offences are poor and illiterate. In many cases, upon being young they have children to take care of, and there are many instances when the children are to live in prisons. The statistics would show that more than 1000 children are living in prisons along with their mothers. This is an aspect that the courts are expected to take note of as it would not only involve the interest of the accused, but also the children who are not expected to get exposed to the prisons. There is a grave danger of their being inherited not only with poverty but with crime as well."

¶27

[2026:RJ-JP:1964]

¶28

(4 of 4) [CRLMB-15401/2025]

¶29

vr% mijksDr fofu'p;] izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ rFkk izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk dh vfHkj{kk vof/k vkfn dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶30

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ;k@vfHk;qDrk lesrk dqekjh iq=h vklwjke fo'uksbZ iRuh Lo- jes'k dqekj dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ;k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls gLrxr izdj.k esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶31

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

¶32

MANISH SAINI /05

Sameta Kumari D/O Shri Asuram Vishnoi W/O Late Ramesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sameta Kumari D/O Shri Asuram Vishnoi W/O Late Ramesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar S/O Shri Gopal Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Navin Khandelwal S/O Shri Sitaram Khandelwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Arjun Lal S/O Harinarayan B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Vishnoi S/O Shri Hariram Vs State of Rajasthan

Shahrukh Khan S/O Poosakhan Vs State of Rajasthan

Mausam Meena W/O Shri Daluram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan