Petition sought liberty to move afresh under legal provisions for registration of an FIR against any accused who commits an offence against witnesses during or after their deposition. The High Court dismissed the petition on that ground and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:49574]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 621/2020
Arjun Lal S/o Harinarayan B/c Meena, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Indawa, Ps Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
Order
05/12/2025
;kph ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us fof/k esa of.kZr izko/kkuksa ds rgr lk{khx.k ds c;ku gksus ds nkSjku ;k i'pkr] ;fn fdlh vfHk;qDr }kjk vijk/k dkfjr fd;k tkuk izFke n`"V;k cuuk ik;k tkrk gS] rks mlds fo#) izlaKku fy;s tkus ds laca/k esa fu;ekuqlkj izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus dh Lora=rk ds lkFk ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk izR;kgfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
fuosnukuqlkj ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk mijksDr Lora=rk ds lkFk izR;kgfjr fd;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
layXu yafcr izkFkZuk i=] ;fn dksbZ gks] fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA
(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J
MANISH SAINI /41
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to file a fresh application for registration of an FIR if an offence is committed against a witness during or after testimony, in accordance with law.
Arjun Lal S/o Harinarayan B/c Meena
State of Rajasthan
Chandra Prakash Shrimali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
