Allowed

Radheshyam Mandal S/O Shri Shivnath Mandal v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Feb 2026CRLMB/15069/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application for an accused charged under BNS provisions for allegedly entering the complainant's house with a co-accused and inflicting injuries. The court noted parity with a co-accused already granted bail, that chargesheet was filed, no life-threatening injuries, and trial would take time, granting bail on personal and surety bonds.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, subject to court appearances.

Radheshyam Mandal S/O Shri Shivnath Mandal Vs the State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:6694]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15069/2025

¶4

Radheshyam Mandal S/o Shri Shivnath Mandal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Goan Laxmipur, Police Station Lokaha District Madhubani Bihar. At Present Petitioner is Behind Bar At Jaipur Jail, Jaipur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Adv. Ms. Chhaya Rani Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI

¶11

Order

¶12

12/02/2026

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk fo|k/kj uxj] t;iqj 'kgj ¼mÙkj½ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 114@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 331¼6½] 109¼1½] 309¼6½] 311 Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] yacs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] lgvfHk;qDr v'kksd e.My dh tekur bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk izdj.k mlls fHkUu ugha gS] izdj.k ds

¶15

[2026:RJ-JP:6694]

¶16

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-15069/2025]

¶17

fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj mls tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA

¶18

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksfir vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkosA

¶19

eSaus mHk; i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

orZeku izdj.k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ij lgvfHk;qDr v'kksd e.My ds lkFk feydj ifjoknh ds edku esa izos'k dj ifjoknh dh iRuh ds gkFk&iSj cka/kdj ywVikV djus ds vijk/k dk vkjksi gSA lgvfHk;qDr v'kksd e.My dk tekur izkFkZuk i= la[;k 13878@2025 vkns'k fnukad 05-02-2026 }kjk bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ij vkjksfir vijk/k lgvfHk;qDr ds leku gh gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] izdj.k esa vkgrx.k ds dkfjr pksVsa izk.k?kkrd ugha crk;h x;h gSa] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA

¶21

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ rFkk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr jk/ks';ke e.My iq= f'koukFk e.My dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k

[2026:RJ-JP:6694]

(3 of 3)

[CRLMB-15069/2025]

tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls gLrxr izdj.k esa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶27

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J

¶28

MANISH SAINI /24

Radheshyam Mandal S/O Shri Shivnath Mandal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radheshyam Mandal S/O Shri Shivnath Mandal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Yadav @ Raghuveer S/O Sadanand @ Bihari Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandresh S/O Sh Hansraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Chetansingh Panwar S/O Late Dhansingh Panwar Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh S/O Kedar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Nitharwal S/O Shri Banwari Lal Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Shaitan Gurjar S/O Dheera Vs State of Rajasthan