Regular bail application in an FIR alleging offences under BNS and Sections 66(c), 66(d) IT Act over cyber fraud through a fake YouTube earning channel. The court found recovery details, online complaints against the petitioner's mobile numbers and the seriousness of the allegations against granting bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:6488]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 941/2026
Chandresh S/o Sh Hansraj, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Udyepuria, Police Station Uniara, District Tonk (Presently In Judicial Custody, District Jail Tonk).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prerit Goyal with Mr. Naman Kasliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
Order
11/02/2026
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk vyhx<+ ftyk Vksad esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 199@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 318¼4½] 319¼2½] 338] 336¼3½] 340¼2½] 316¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk rFkk 66¼lh½] 66¼Mh½ lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh la'kks/ku vf/kfu;e 2000 esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 13-12-2025 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gS] mlds fo#) vU; /kkjkvksa esa tks vkjksi yxk, x, gSa] mu /kkjkvksa esa ls /kkjk 66¼lh½] 66¼Mh½ lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh vf/kfu;e esa tekurh vijk/k ls lacaf/kr gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ij ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ftl QthZ pSuy iadt Hkkj}kt os Vw ykHk dk vkjksi yxk;k x;k gS] ml pSuy ls ;k fdlh vU; pSuy ls izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk dksbZ ysuk&nsuk ugha gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr
[2026:RJ-JP:6488]
[CRLMB-941/2026]
(2 of 5)
dkaxzsl ikVhZ ls tqM+k gqvk gS] blfy, jktuhfrd }s"krk ls mls >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ij yxk, x, vkWuykbu Bxh ds vkjksi feF;k vkSj >wBs gSa] mlus dksbZ vkWuykbu Bxh ugha dh gSA pSuy ftlds }kjk lapkfyr gS ,oa fuekZrk gS] mlds laca/k esa dksbZ vuqla/kku ugha fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) tks vkjksfir vijk/k gSa] mu vijk/kksa ls lacaf/kr izdj.kksa esa bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk ;k vU; ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; dh ihB ds }kjk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k x;k gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj mls tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkosA
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us vius rdksZa ds leFkZu e s a fuEu fofu'p; izLrqr fd, gSa%&
1- Dilkhush Meena Versus State of Rajasthan; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No. 572/2025 and others Connected Matters; order dated 14.04.2025.
[2026:RJ-JP:6488]
[CRLMB-941/2026]
(3 of 5)
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) ftu eksckbZy uEcjksa ij lkbZcj iksVZy ij 3 f'kdk;rs feyh gSa os rhuksa gh eksckbZy uacj izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds uke ij gksuk ik, x, gSaA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr us lkbcj Bxh esa tks iSls vius [kkrs esa VªkalQj fd, gSa] mudk cSad LVsVesaV i=koyh esa izLrqr gqvk gSA 75 gtkj #i, dh jkf'k cSad [kkrs esa tek gqbZA lkbcj Bxh dh jkf'k tek gksus ds laca/k esa VªkalQj dh fMVsYl dsl Mk;jh esa gSA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksfir vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkosA
eSaus mHk; i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA
orZeku izdj.k esa vUos"k.k ds nkSjku izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr panzs'k ls b.Mªk;M eksckby feyk ftlesa 2 fle yxh gqbZ feyh vkSj nksuksa ij okV~l,i pyrk gqvk ik;k x;k] muesa ls ,d fctusl okVl,i uacj ij
[2026:RJ-JP:6488]
[CRLMB-941/2026]
(4 of 5)
lkbcj Bxh ds laca/k esa ,ulhvkjih iksVZy ij vkWuykbu f'kdk;r ntZ gksuk ik;k x;kA bl laca/k esa fujo dkyksyk }kjk dqy 21]400@& #i, dh lkbcj Bxh dh vkWuykbu f'kdk;r ntZ djkbZ xbZ] ftlesa dqy 6 ckj VªkaUtsD'ku dj dqy 21]400@& #i, dh Bxh gqbZA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh nwljs okVl,i fle ls lkbcj Bxh ds laca/k esa nks vkWuykbu f'kdk;r izkIr gqbZ ftuesa ls ,d f'kdk;r iquhr flag vkSj nwljh f'kdk;r /kzqo nknwd dh FkhA iquhr flag dh f'kdk;r ds vk/kkj ij 2 VªkaltsD'ku gq, ftlesa dqy 8]600@&#i, dh Bxh dh xbZA vUos"k.k ds nkSjku ;g rF; Hkh lkeus vk;k gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh eksckby dh tkap djus ij eksckby esa Iyl ,si ij ,d QthZ pSuy iadt Hkkj}kt os Vw ykHk ds uke ls fdz,V fd;k gSA vUos"k.k ds nkSjku ;g rF; Hkh lkeus vk;k gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr us vius okVl,i ij vutku uEcjksa ls U;w TokWbZfuax ds uke ls okV~lvi ij eSlst djds lacaf/kr ls lEidZ dj ykyp fn[kkdj lkbZcj Bxh dh xbZA izFke lwpuk fjikVZ esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk foxr 2 o"kksZa ls djhcu 8&10 yk[k #i, vkWuykbu Bxh ds ek/;e ls izkIr djuk crk;k x;k gSA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vkWuykbu Bxh ds ek/;e ls 75 gtkj #i, dk VªkaltsD'ku gksuk crk;k gS rFkk blds laca/k esa cSad LVsVesaV Hkh gksuk crk;kA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) ftu eksckbZy uEcjksa ij lkbZcj iksVZy ij 3 f'kdk;rs feyh gSa os rhuksa gh eksckbZy uacj izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds uke ij gksuk ik, x, gSaA lkbcj vijk/k vR;f/kd c<+ jgs gSaA
vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) muds }kjk izLrqr fofu'p; bl izdj.k ds rF;] ifjfLFkfr;ksa ls fHkUu gksus ds dkj.k ls rFkk izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa o izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksfir vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk bl izØe ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
[2026:RJ-JP:6488]
[CRLMB-941/2026]
(5 of 5)
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr pUnzs'k iq= Jh galjkt dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J
Kishan Soni/43
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail under Section 483 BNSS should be granted to the accused in a cyber-fraud case involving online cheating and a forged payment channel.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dilkhush Meena Versus State of Rajasthan; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No. 572/2025 and others Connected Matters; order dated 14.04.2025Referred
Maninder Singh Versus State of Rajasthan; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No. 572/2025; order dated 10.01.2025Referred
Mahesh Kumar Versus State of Rajasthan; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No. 4110/2024 and Others Connected Matters; order dated 16.05.2024Referred
Raghunath Versus State of Rajasthan; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No. 10008/2024 and others Connected Matters; order dated 29.11.2024Referred
Vakil and Ors. Versus State of Rajasthan; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No. 6842/2024 and others Connected Matters; order dated 13.06.2024Referred
Rajpal Versus State of Rajasthan; S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No. 76/2025 and others Connected Matters; order dated 25.03.2025Referred
Manoj Kumar Pattnaik Versus State of Odisha (OPID); BLAPL No. 14644 of 2023 & BLAPL No. 14599 of 2023; order dated 17.05.2024Referred
Shri Rahdor Thangkhiew Versus State of Meghalaya and Ors.; 2025:MLHC:827; order dated 11.09.2025Referred
Shailendra Tiwari Versus State Nct of Delhi; Bail Appln. 1458/2025; order dated 22.08.2025Referred
Manu Prashant Wig Versus State of Nct Delhi; Bail Appln. 1926/2024; order dated 20.12.2024Referred
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Chandresh S/o Sh Hansraj
State of Rajasthan
Chandra Prakash Shrimali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
