Allowed¶19

Ramlal Lodha S/O Nandram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Jan 2026CRLMB/14085/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ramlal Lodha v. State of Rajasthan; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14085/2025; High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur; Justice Ganesh Ram Meena; decided 08/01/2026; bail application u/S 483 BNSS; FIR No. 92/2025; Police Station Kasba Thana; District Baran; offence punishable u/S 309(6); charge-sheet submitted; custody since 18.09.2025; bail allowed; personal bond Rs. 1,00,000/-; two sureties Rs. 50,000/- each; counsel Mr. Bhim Singh Meena; PP Ms. Aarti Sharma.

What did the court decide?

Release of the accused-petitioner on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, with stipulation of appearance before the Trial Court on all hearing dates. ¶19

Ramlal Lodha S/O Nandram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether the accused petitioner, implicated in FIR No. 92/2025 of Police Station Kasba Thana, District Baran for offence punishable u/S 309(6) and in custody since 18.09.2025 after submission of the charge-sheet, should be enlarged on bail u/S 483 BNSS.

¶12

Court's answer

Taking into account the allegations against the accused petitioner, the fact that the police had already submitted the charge-sheet after completion of investigation, and that the petitioner was in custody for more than 3 months, the Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deemed it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.

¶18

Ratio / Principle

The bail application is allowed; the accused-petitioner is to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon.

¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail — S. 483 BNSS — FIR No. 92/2025, Police Station Kasba Thana, District Baran, offence punishable u/S 309(6) — charge-sheet submitted after completion of investigation — accused petitioner in custody since 18.09.2025 (more than 3 months) — Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deemed it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail — release ordered on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, stipulating appearance before the Trial Court — Order dated 08/01/2026 by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA.

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:487]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14085/2025

¶4

Ramlal Lodha S/o Nandram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Badhera, Police Station Badarwas, District Shivpuri ( M.p.) ( Accused Presently Confined At District Jail Baran)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhim Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order

¶11

08/01/2026

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 92/2025 registered at Police Station Kasba Thana, District Baran for offence punishable u/S 309(6).

¶13

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the accused petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2025. Counsel further submits that the trial of the case may take long time.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the allegations against the accused petitioner are of serious nature.

[2026:RJ-JP:487]

[CRLMB-14085/2025]

(2 of 2)

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner and taking into consideration the allegations against the accused petitioner and so also the fact that after completion of investigation the police has already submitted charge-sheet and the petitioner is in custody for last more than 3 months, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶21

Gaurav Srivastava /86

Ramlal Lodha S/O Nandram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramlal Lodha S/O Nandram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Food Corporation of India Vs M/S Mohd Shamim Gauri

Jay Prakash @ Banti S/O Madan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Deenu @ Deen Mohammad S/O Nasru Vs State of Rajasthan

Gudiya Devi W/O Hanuman Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishan Kumar Sharma S/O Jamuna Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Mausam S/O Rahim Vs State of Rajasthan