Krishan Kumar Sharma S/O Jamuna Prasad Vs State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

Krishan Kumar Sharma S/O Jamuna Prasad Vs State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Both accused petitioners enlarged on bail u/S 483 BNSS upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) each with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court; stipulations to appear on all subsequent hearing dates and not to celebrate release in public (violation entitles the State to seek cancellation of bail).

Issue for consideration

Whether the accused petitioners should be enlarged on bail u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 289/2025, PS Christianganj, District Ajmer, for offences punishable u/S 318(4) & 61(2)(a) BNS. +1 more

Court's answer

Considering that the offences alleged are triable by Magistrate, the police has submitted the charge-sheet after completion of investigation, and the accused petitioners are in custody since 10.10.2025, the Court deemed just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case.

Ratio / Principle

Release on bail was made conditional on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) each, together with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with stipulation to appear before that Court (or any Court to which the matter is transferred) on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon.

Key takeaways

A stipulated condition bars the accused-petitioners from celebrating their release in public; if they are found doing so, the State shall be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of their bail.ratio¶21

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench (Ganesh Ram Meena, J.; order dated 08/01/2026) in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14022/2025: bail granted under S. 483 BNSS to two accused (Krishan Kumar Sharma and Manoj Kumar), in custody in Central Jail Ajmer since 10.10.2025 in connection with FIR No. 289/2025 of PS Christianganj, District Ajmer for offences punishable u/S 318(4) & 61(2)(a) BNS. Grounds: offences triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet submitted after completion of investigation; custody since 10.10.2025. No opinion expressed on merits. Conditions: personal bond Rs. 1,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each; appearance on all hearing dates; and, having regard to the reported practice of accused involved in online fraud publicly celebrating release, a bar on public celebration of release, breach permitting the State to apply for bail cancellation.

[2026:RJ-JP:481]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14022/2025

Krishan Kumar Sharma S/o Jamuna Prasad, Aged About 40 Years, R/o House No. F-129, First Floor, Radha City Goverdhan Road, P.s. Highway, District Mathura (Up) At Present R/o Pandey Mohalla, P.S. Deeg, District Bharatpur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer).

Manoj Kumar S/o Balram Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Malsarai, P.S. Goverdhan, District Mathura (UP) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer).

----Petitioners

Versus

The State of Rajasthan, through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Devanshu Sharma, alongwith
	Ms. Vishalakshi Pareek
For Respondent(s)	: Ms. Aarti Sharma,PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order

08/01/2026

This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 289/2025 registered at Police Station Christianganj, District Ajmer for offences punishable u/S 318(4), & 61(2)(a) BNS.

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that offences alleged against the accused petitioners are triable by Magistrate and after conclusion of the investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He also submits that the accused petitioners are in custody since 10.10.2025.

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.

[2026:RJ-JP:481]

[CRLMB-14022/2025]

(2 of 2)

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioners and taking into consideration the allegations against them as the offences alleged against them are triable by Magistrate and after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the accused petitioners are in custody since 10.10.2025, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) each, together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)(each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

It has been brought to the notice of this Court that such type of accused persons of particular areas, who are found to be involved in the online fraud, after their release from a criminal case, celebrate their release in public, hence, taking into consideration the aforesaid aspect, a condition is stipulated that the accused-petitioner shall not celebrate their release in public, and if they are found to be involved in celebrating their release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of their bail.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

Gaurav Srivastava /82