Sachin @ Ravan S/O Jasmat Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

Sachin @ Ravan S/O Jasmat Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Bail allowed under Section 483 B.N.S.S.: petitioner Sachin @ Ravan S/o Jasmat to be released on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, with stipulation to appear on all subsequent hearing dates till conclusion of trial, and further conditions: (i) marking presence before the SHO, Police Station Kumher every 15 days each month till conclusion of trial; (ii) concerned SHO to maintain a register and immediately report non-appearance to the trial court; (iii) petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future; (iv) breach of directions may be applied for by the Public Prosecutor as ground for cancellation of bail, with trial court at liberty to cancel bail.

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, implicated in FIR No.424/2025 (Police Station Kumher, District Deeg) for offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, 2023, and in custody since 19.08.2025, deserves to be released on bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

Court's answer

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record, and without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, the Court was inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

Ratio / Principle

The bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed; the petitioner Sachin @ Ravan is to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, with the stipulation that he appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

Key takeaways

As a further condition of bail, the petitioner is to mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Kumher, District Deeg once every 15 days each month till conclusion of trial, with the concerned SHO directed to maintain a register for this purpose and report non-compliance to the trial court.ratio¶22

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur, single-judge order dated 06/03/2026) allowed bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. (CRLMB-1282/2026) filed by Sachin @ Ravan S/o Jasmat in FIR No.424/2025, Police Station Kumher, District Deeg, concerning offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, 2023; counsel submitted the allegation pertains to theft of copper wire from the complainant's godown and the offence is triable by the Magistrate. Petitioner in custody since 19.08.2025; fifteen antecedent cases reported, in all of which he had already been bailed out. Without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits, bail granted on personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, conditioned on appearance before the trial court on all hearing dates, fortnightly presence-marking before the SHO, Police Station Kumher till conclusion of trial (register to be maintained by SHO, non-compliance to be reported to trial court), abstention from future offences, and liability to cancellation of bail upon breach.

[2026:RJ-JP:9597]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1282/2026

Sachin @ Ravan S/o Jasmat, R/o Nagla Lakhan (Painghor), P.s. Kumher, District Deeg. (At Present In District Jail Deeg).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal with Mr. Hitesh Haritwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

06/03/2026

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.424/2025 registered at Police Station Kumher, District Deeg for offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, 2023.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegation levelled against the petitioner pertains to the alleged theft of copper wire from the godown of the complainant. It is contended that the alleged offence is triable by the Magistrate. Petitioner is behind the bars since 19.08.2025. Though fifteen cases have been reported as antecedent against petitioner but in all that cases, he has been already bailed out. The trial of

(2 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:9597]

[CRLMB-1282/2026]

the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sachin @ Ravan S/o Jasmat, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:-

(i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Police Station Kumher, District Deeg in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.

(ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:9597]

[CRLMB-1282/2026]

immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard.

(iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future.

(iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

Chandan/34