Rohan @ Jaspal Gurjar S/O Ramavtar Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:14511]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1145/2026

Rohan @ Jaspal Gurjar S/o Ramavtar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Banwas, Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu, Raj. At Present in Central Jail Ajmer.

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2428/2026

¶11

Sandeep S/o Dharmpal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Harnathpura, Police Station Singhana, District Jhunujhunu. (At Present Lodge At Central Jail Jaipur (Raj.)

¶12

----Accused-Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Sharma Mr. Rajesh Kumar Yadav, Mr. Lucky Sharma with Mr. Sudhir Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP

¶17

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶18

Order

¶19

08/04/2026

¶20

These bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 16/2025 registered at Police Station Chandwaji, District Jaipur Rural, Jaipur for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2) of BNS, in which charge-sheet has been filed under Sections 316(2), 336(2), 338, 340(2),61(1) & 238(a) of BNS.

[2026:RJ-JP:14511]

[CRLMB-1145/2026]

(2 of 3)

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed; He further submits that the main accused are Lokesh and Rithik; accused-petitioners Rohan @ Jaspal Gurjar and Sandeep are behind the bars since 31.12.2025 and 19.12.2025 respectively; the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶25

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications and submits that there are eleven other criminal antecedents against accused-petitioner Rohan @ Jaspal Gurjar.

¶26

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed; accused- petitioners Rohan @ Jaspal Gurjar and Sandeep are behind the bars since 31.12.2025 and 19.12.2025 respectively; the matter is triable by Magistrate; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶27

Therefore, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Rohan @ Jaspal Gurjar S/o Ramavtar and Sandeep S/o Dharmpal are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the

[2026:RJ-JP:14511]

[CRLMB-1145/2026]

(3 of 3)

stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶32

It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 1^st and 15^th day of every month in the concerned police station.

¶33

In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶34

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶35

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶36

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶37

EKTA/14-15

Rohan @ Jaspal Gurjar S/O Ramavtar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohan @ Jaspal Gurjar S/O Ramavtar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sher Singh S/O Ram Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ompal S/O Mannaram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Banwarilal @ Damkiya S/O Shri Bhagwanaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Shyoran S/O Nemichand Vs State of Rajasthan

Omprakash Kashyap S/O Late Shri Dhannalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sandeep S/O Dharmpal Vs State of Rajasthan