Banwarilal @ Damkiya S/O Shri Bhagwanaram Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:14269]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3568/2026

Banwarilal @ Damkiya S/o Shri Bhagwanaram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Govindpura, Police Station Sadar Fatehpur, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar).

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

07/04/2026

¶13

This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accusedpetitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.565/2025 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 324(4), 351(2), 307 & 3(5) of BNS, in which charge-sheet has been filed under Sections 115(2), 127(2), 309(4) & 3(5) of BNS.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed; He further submits that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; petitioner is behind the bars since 27.11.2025; trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

[2026:RJ-JP:14269]

[CRLMB-3568/2026]

(2 of 3)

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that five other criminal antecedents are registered against the accused-petitioner.

¶19

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has been filed; petitioner is behind the bars since 27.11.2025; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Banwarilal @ Damkiya S/o Shri Bhagwanaram, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1^st and 15^th day of every month in the concerned police station.

¶22

In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

[2026:RJ-JP:14269]

[CRLMB-3568/2026]

(3 of 3)

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶27

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶28

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶29

EKTA/21

Banwarilal @ Damkiya S/O Shri Bhagwanaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Banwarilal @ Damkiya S/O Shri Bhagwanaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Taneja S/O Sharwan Kumar Taneja Vs the State of Rajasthan

Kan Singh S/O Shri Sugan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Puran Singh S/O Rewat Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sher Singh S/O Ram Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ompal S/O Mannaram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rajkumar S/O Ramniwas, Vs State of Rajasthan