Allowed

Lallu Prasad v. Mahesh Kumar and Ors.

Rajasthan HC13 Jan 2026CMA/224/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Motor accident injury appeal by a self-employed carpenter with 20.85% permanent disability seeking enhancement of the tribunal award of Rs.1,24,350. The court accepted his highest income tax return for income, added future prospects and loss of earning capacity, awarded damages under various non-pecuniary heads, and enhanced compensation to Rs.3,20,920 with pay-and-recover against the insurer.

What did the court decide?

Compensation enhanced from Rs.1,24,350 to Rs.3,20,920 with 8% annual interest from date of filing; previously received amount to be deducted; insurer to first pay with pay-and-recover against vehicle

Lallu Prasad Vs Mahesh Kumar and Ors. — Insurance | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:5053]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 224/2010

¶4

Lallu Prasad S/o Badri Prasad, Aged 54 Years, R/o Khatiwali Kothi, Tehsil- Chhareda, Distt. Dausa.

¶5

----Claimant-Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Mahesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ramsahay Meena, R/o Village Mukandpura, Tehsil- Lalsot, Distt.-Dausa (Driver And Owner of The Vehicle Jeep No. RJ-29-T-0267)

¶8

Mathura Lal Sharma S/o Shri Ganga Sahay, R/o Village Nichali Meena Patti, Tehsil- Sikray, Distt. Dausa. (Insured of The Vehicle Jeep No. RJ-29P-0392 Changed No. RJ-29-T-0267)

¶9

National Insurance Company Ltd. Through Its Branch Manager, Branch Office, Distt. Dausa Having Its Regional Office At LIC Building, Ambedkar Circle, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur (Insurer of The Vehicle Jeep No. RJ-29P0392 Changed No. RJ-29-T-0267)

¶10

----Non-Claimants-Respondents

¶11

For Appellant(s)	:	Mr. J.P. Gupta, Adv.
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Yashvardhan Tolani, Adv. for Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Adv. (for Respondent No. 1)
		Mr. Ram Singh Rathore, Adv. (for Respondent No. 2) Mr. V.P. Mathur, Adv. (for Respondent No. 3)

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

¶13

Order

¶14

13/01/2026

¶15

1- vihykFkhZ yYyw izlkn }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; U;k;k/kh'k] eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] ¼fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] v-tk-@v-t-tk- ¿vR;kpkj fuokj.k] izdj.kÀ nkSlk½ ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk

(2 of 11)

[2026:RJ-JP:5053]

[CMA-224/2010]

Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&¼509@2004½ 07@2006] yYyw izlkn cuke egs'k dqekj o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 31-07-2009 ¼ftls vkxs ^vk{ksfir fu.kZ;^ ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- vihykFkhZ yYyw izlkn }kjk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa Lo;a ds vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 22]78]000@& #i;s Dyse izkIr djus gsrq Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k djrs gq, ;kph dks dqy 1]24]350@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k e; C;kt 06 izfr'kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA

¶20

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk gS fd oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ dkj isaVj dk dk;Z dj izfrekg 20]000@& #i;s dh vk; vftZr djrk Fkk] vihykFkhZ }kjk viuh vk; ds laca/k esa vk;dj foojf.kdk,a i=koyh ij is'k dh x;h fdUrq fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh vafre vk;dj foojf.kdk esa n'kkZ;h x;h okf"kZd vk; ds vk/kkj ij vihykFkhZ dh ekfld vk; 4]500@& #i;s izfrekg fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh x;h gSA tcfd vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vk;dj foojf.kdkvksa esa ls lokZf/kd vk; okyh vk;dj foojf.kdk ds vk/kkj ij vihykFkhZ dh vk; fu/kkZfjr dh tkuh pkfg, FkhA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ ds nk;sa gkFk esa rFkk iSj esa vfLFk Hkax dh xaHkhj pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ] ftuds QyLo:i vihykFkhZ ds 'kjhj ij dqy 20-85 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh fu/kkZfjr ekfld vk; ij Hkfo"; dh izR;k'kk dh en esa dksbZ o`f) ugha dh x;h gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kkvksa dh deh ds en esa] 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihM+k dh en esa o vU; enksa esa Hkh dksbZ jkf'k vihykFkhZ dks ugha fnyokbZ x;h gSA

[2026:RJ-JP:5053]

[CMA-224/2010]

(3 of 11)

vr% mijksDr vk/kkjksa ij vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

¶25

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZx.k dh vksj ls vihykFkhZ ds mijksDr rdksZa dk fojks/k fd;k x;k o fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

¶26

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh o fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA 6- ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds QyLo:i vihykFkhZ ds 'kjhj ij dqy 20-85 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gS] tSlk fd LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk izek.k i= izn'kZ&10 ds voyksdu ls Li"V gSA eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lanHkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of

¶27

Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr. reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases 450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

¶28

“ 12 . In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be compensated for his inability to lead a full life, and enjoy those things and amenities which he would have enjoyed, but for the injuries.

¶29

13 . The purpose of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act is to fully and adequately restore the aggrieved to the position prior to the accident. This Court in Yadava Kumar v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. explained “just compensation” in the following words:

¶30

15 . It goes without saying that in matters of determination of compensation both the tribunal and the court are statutorily charged

(4 of 11)

[2026:RJ-JP:5053]

[CMA-224/2010]

with a responsibility of fixing a “just compensation”. It is obviously true that determination of a just compensation cannot be equated to a bonanza. At the same time the concept of “just compensation” obviously suggests application of fair and equitable principles and a reasonable approach on the part of the tribunals and courts. This reasonableness on the part of the tribunal and court must be on a large peripheral field.”

¶35

7- i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd ekeys dh ?kVuk fnukad 10-06-2004 dh crkbZ x;h gS rFkk oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ dks 52 o"kZ dh vk;q dk gksuk crkrs gq, dkjisaVj dk dk;Z dj 20]000@& #i;s izfrekg dh vk; vftZr djuk crk;k x;k gSA vihykFkhZ }kjk viuh vk; dks lkfcr djus gsrq foRrh; o"kZ 1999&2000@dj fu/kkZj.k o"kZ 2000&2001 dh vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&38] foRrh; o"kZ 2000&2001@dj fu/kkZj.k o"kZ 2001&2002 dh vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&39] foRrh; o"kZ 2001&2002@dj fu/kkZj.k o"kZ 2002&2003 dh vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&40 rFkk foRrh; o"kZ 2002&2003@dj fu/kkZj.k o"kZ 2003&2004 dh vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&41 i=koyh ij is'k dh x;hA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh vafre vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&41 ij fo'okl djrs gq, mDr vk;dj foojf.kdk eas nf'kZr okf"kZd vk; 54]800@& #i;s ds vk/kkj ij vihykFkhZ dh ekfld vk; 4]500@& #i;s fu/kkZfjr dh x;h gSA tcfd vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vk;dj foojf.kdkvksa esa ls lokZf/kd vk; okyh vk;dj foojf.kdk dks vk/kkj ekurs gq, vihykFkhZ dh vk; fu/kkZfjr dh tkuh pkfg, FkhA vihykFkhZ dh foRrh; o"kZ 1999&2000@dj fu/kkZj.k o"kZ 2000&2001 dh vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&38 esa vihykFkhZ dh dqy okf"kZd vk; 62]532@& #i;s] foRrh; o"kZ 2000&2001@dj fu/kkZj.k o"kZ 2001&2002 dh vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&39 esa dqy okf"kZd vk; 68]452@& #i;s] foRrh; o"kZ 2001&2002@dj fu/kkZj.k o"kZ 2002&2003 dh vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&40 esa dqy okf"kZd vk; 72]928@& #i;s rFkk foRrh; o"kZ 2002&2003@dj fu/kkZj.k o"kZ 2003&2004 dh vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&41 esa dqy okf"kZd

[2026:RJ-JP:5053]

[CMA-224/2010]

(5 of 11)

vk; 54]800@& #i;s n'kkZ;h x;h gSA ?kVuk fnukad 10-06-2004 dh crkbZ x;h gS rFkk vihykFkhZ dh foRrh; o"kZ 1999&2000] foRrh; o"kZ 2000&2001] foRrh; o"kZ 2001&2002 rFkk foRrh; o"kZ 2002&2003 dh vk;dj foojf.kdk,a izn'kZ&38 yxk;r izn'kZ&41] Lo;a vihykFkhZ }kjk nq?kZVuk iwoZ nkf[ky dh x;h gSa] ftuesa vihykFkhZ dh okf"kZd vk; ?kVrh&c<+rh jgh gSA tgka rd lokZf/kd vk; okyh vk;dj foojf.kdk ds vk/kkj ij vihykFkhZ dh vk; fu/kkZfjr fd;s tkus dk iz'u gS rks bl laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d n`"Vkar Malarvizhi & Ors. Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited & Ors. reported in (2020) 4 SCC 228 ds ekeys ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd %&

¶40

" 10 . .......The tax return indicates an annual income of Rs 2,11,131 in the relevant assessment year. Mr Jayanth Muth Raj, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant contended that other documents were marked which reflected the income of the deceased. We are in agreement with the High Court that the determination must proceed on the basis of the income tax return, where available. The income tax return is a statutory document on which reliance may be placed to determine the annual income of the deceased. To the benefit of the appellants, the High Court has proceeded on the basis of the income tax return for the assessment year 1997-1998 and not 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 which reflected a reduction in the annual income of the deceased."

¶41

8- ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius mijksDr U;kf;d n"Vkar esa ;g er O;Dr fd;k gS fd vk;dj foojf.kdk ,d fof/kd nLrkost gS] ftlds vk/kkj ij erd@vkgr dh vk; fu/kkZfjr dh tk ldrh gSA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius mDr U;kf;d n"Vkar esa erd dh izLrqr vk;dj foojf.kdkvksa esa ls lokZf/kd vk; okyh vk;dj foojf.kdk ij fo'okl fd;k tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dk fu/kkZj.k fd;k x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr

(6 of 11)

[2026:RJ-JP:5053]

[CMA-224/2010]

esa ;g U;k;ky; U;kf;d n`"Vkar Malarvizhi (supra) ds ekeys esa ikfjr er ls lger gksrs gq,] bl ekeys esa Hkh vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vk;dj foojf.kdkvksa esa ls lokZf/kd vk; okyh vk;dj foojf.kdk ij fo'okl djrs gq, vihykFkhZ dh vk; fu/kkZfjr fd;k tkuk mfpr le>rh gSA vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vk;dj foojf.kdkvksa esa ls foRrh; o"kZ 2001&2002@dj fu/kkZj.k o"kZ 2002&2003 dh vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&40 esa vihykFkhZ dh dqy okf"kZd vk; 72]928@& #i;s n'kkZ;h x;h gS tks fd vihykFkhZ dh lokZf/kd vk; gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g U;k;ky; vihykFkhZ dh foRrh; o"kZ 2001&2002@dj fu/kkZj.k o"kZ 2002&2003 dh vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&40 ds vk/kkj vihykFkhZ dh okf"kZd vk; 72]928@& #i;s fu/kkZfjr fd;k tkuk mfpr le>rh gSA

¶46

9- fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh fu/kkZfjr vk; ij Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; dh c<+ksrjh ds en esa dksbZ of) ugha dh x;h gSA Dyse ;kfpdk esa oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ dks 52 o"kZ vk;q dk gksuk crk;k x;k gSA vihykFkhZ dh vk;dj foojf.kdk izn'kZ&38 yxk;r izn'kZ&41 esa vihykFkhZ dh tUefrfFk 13-05-1954 vafdr dh x;h gS rFkk ?kVuk fnukad 10-06-2004 dh crkbZ x;h gS] ftlds vuqlkj oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ dh vk;q 50 o"kZ] 28 fnol FkhA bl laca/k esa gekjk ekuuk ;g gS fd oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ dh vk;q 50 o"kZ] 28 fnol rks Fkh] fdUrq vihykFkhZ iw.kZ :i ls 51 o"kZ dh vk;q dk ugha gqvk FkkA bl laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d n"Vkar M.H. Uma Maheshwari & Ors. Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. reported in 2020 (2) R.A.R. 185 (SC) ds ekeys esa ;g er O;Dr fd;k gS fd %&

¶47

" 9. The Tribunal, by recording a finding that the deceased was in the age group of 40 to 50 years, applied the multiplier of 13 while calculating the compensation. The High Court, curiously while maintaining the multiplier of 13 as per the judgment of this Court in compensation only on the ground that the deceased was aged 50 years 3

(7 of 11)

[2026:RJ-JP:5053]

[CMA-224/2010]

months on the date of the accident, as such the compensation is to be calculated on account of loss of dependency by granting future prospects at 15% but not 30%. So far as the application of multiplier of 13 by the Tribunal is concerned, the High Court has not interfered with the same. When the age of the deceased was considered in the group of 40 to 50 years, we are of the view that the High Court has committed error in granting only 15% towards future prospects instead of 30%. As per the judgments of this Court, primarily the age group is to be considered. Considering the age group as 40 to 50 years, when the multiplier of 13 is maintained by the High Court, there is no reason or justification for reducing the compensation by granting 15% towards future prospects. Though the learned counsel appearing for Respondent 1 Insurance Company has submitted that the compensation towards future prospects was awarded as per the Constitution Bench judgment of this Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi³ but at the same time it is to be noticed that in the very same judgment in para 59.3, while considering the grant of future prospects, this Court has specifically said that the addition should be 30% if the age of the deceased was in the age group of 40 to 50 years. For application of multiplier, the High Court has also accepted the age group of the deceased between 40 and 50 years. In that view of the matter, there is no reason for reducing the compensation by granting future prospects at 15% only."

¶52

10bl izdkj ,e-,p- mek egs'ojh ¼mijksDr½ ds ekeys esa ikfjr erkuqlkj ;g U;k;ky; oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ dks 40 ls 50 o"kZ ds vk;q oxZ esa ekurs us'kuy ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM cuke iz.k; lsBh o vU; fjiksVsZM bu ¼2017½ 16 ,l-lh-lh- 680 ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vuqlkj vihykFkhZ dh vk;q dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, mldh fu/kkZfjr okf"kZd vk; 72]928@& #i;s ij mls oDr ?kVuk Lofu;ksftr O;olk;h gksuk ekurs gq,

[2026:RJ-JP:5053]

[CMA-224/2010]

(8 of 11)

25 izfr'kr dh Hkfo"; o`f) fd;k tkuk mfpr le>rh gSA rn~uqlkj 72]928@& #i;s dk 25 izfr'kr 18]232@& #i;s gksrk gSA mDr 25 izfr'kr jkf'k dks vihykFkhZ dh fu/kkZfjr okf"kZd vk; esa tksM+s tkus ds mijkar vihykFkhZ dh dqy 'kq) okf"kZd vk; 91]160@& #i;s gksrh gS tks {kfriwfrZ ds fu/kkZj.k dk vk/kkj jgsxhA

¶57

11gLrxr ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ ds 'kjhj ds fofHkUu Hkkxksa esa lk/kkj.k o xaHkhj pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ o vihykFkhZ ds nk;as gkFk esa rFkk nk;sa iSj dh fVfc;k o fQcqyk gMMh esa vfLFk Hkax dh xaHkhj pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ] ftuds lkewfgd izHkko ls vihykFkhZ ds 'kjhj ij dqy 20-85 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gS] tSlk fd LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk izek.k i= izn'kZ&10 ds voyksdu ls Li"V gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ ds 'kjhj ij dkfjr gqbZ 20-85 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk dks lEiw.kZ 'kjhj ds ifjizs{; eas Hkh 20 izfr'kr vkadk x;k gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr fu"d"kZ esa ge dksbZ gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha le>rs gSaA ,slh fLFkfr esa fuf'pr :i ls vihykFkhZ dks Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; esa deh gksuk LokHkkfod gSA bl izdkj vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ 20 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk ds vk/kkj ij ge] vihykFkhZ dks vk; dh {kfr Hkh 20 izfr'kr gksuk ikrs gSaA rnuqlkj vihykFkhZ dh fu/kkZfjr okf"kZd vk; 91]160@& #i;s dk 20 izfr'kr 18]232@& #i;s gksrk gS tks vihykFkhZ dks Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; dh okf"kZd {kfr gSA oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ dh vk;q 50 o"kZ] 28 fnol FkhA ,slh fLFkfr esa ljyk oekZ o vU; cuke nsgyh VªkaliksVZ dkWiksZjs'ku o vU; fjiksVsZM bu ¼2009½ 6 ,l-lh-lh- 121] ,e-,p- mek egs'ojh ¼mijksDr½ rFkk iz.k; lsBh ¼mijksDr½ ds ekeyksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vuqlkj vihykFkhZ dks Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; dh {kfriwfrZ dh x.kuk gsrq vihykFkhZ dh vk;q dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, 13 dk xq.kd yxk;k tkuk visf{kr gSA rn~uqlkj vihykFkhZ dks Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; dh dqy {kfr 18]232 x 13 = 2]37]016@& #i;s gksrh gS tks vihykFkhZ izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA

[2026:RJ-JP:5053]

[CMA-224/2010]

(9 of 11)

12fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihM+k dh en esa rFkk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kkvksa dh deh ds en esa i`Fkd ls dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ x;h gSA vr% 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihM+k dh en esa ge] 20]000@& #i;s rFkk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kkvksa dh deh ds en esa 20]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k vihykFkhZ dks fnyok;k tkuk mfpr le>rs gSaA

¶62

13fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks ikSf"Vd vkgkj dh en esa rFkk ;krk;kr o ifjogu ij O;; jkf'k ds en eas Hkh i`Fkd ls dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ x;h gSA ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ ds nk;sa gkFk o nk;sa iSj esa vfLFk Hkax dh xaHkhj pksVsa dkfjr gksuk crk;k x;k gS] ftlds QyLo:i vihykFkhZ dks fo'ks"k vkgkj dh vko';drk jgh gksxh rFkk vihykFkhZ dks Lo;a ds bykt gsrq vLirky Hkh vkuk&tkuk iM+k gksxkA ,slh fLFkfr esa ge] ikSf"Vd vkgkj dh en esa 10]000@& #i;s rFkk ;krk;kr o ifjogu ij O;; jkf'k ds en esa 5]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k vihykFkhZ dks fnyok;k tkuk mfpr le>rs gSaA

¶63

14fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks bykt ds nkSjku O;; dh x;h jkf'k ds en esa 5]550@& #i;s dh jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] bles ge dksbZ gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha le>rs gSaA

¶64

15ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa dkfjr pksVksa ds QyLo:i vihykFkhZ 02 fnol rd vLirky esa HkrhZ jgk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa 02 fnol rd vLirky esa HkrhZ jgus dh en esa ge] 600@& #i;s izfrfnu dh nj ls 1]200@& #i;s dh jkf'k vihykFkhZ dks fnyok;k tkuk mfpr le>rs gSaA

¶65

16fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks byktjr vof/k ds nkSjku gqbZ vk; dh gkfu ds en esa Hkh dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ x;h gSA ;g LoHkkfod gS fd ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ ds 'kjhj ij dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds QyLo:i vihykFkhZ djhc nks ekg rd vk; vftZr djus esa vleFkZ jgk gksxkA ,slh fLFkfr esa ge] byktjr vof/k ds nkSjku gqbZ nks ekg dh vk;

(10 of 11)

[2026:RJ-JP:5053]

[CMA-224/2010]

dh gkfu ds en esa 12]154@& #i;s dh jkf'k vihykFkhZ dks fnyok;k tkuk mfpr le>rs gSaA

¶70

17ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds QyLo:i vihykFkhZ }kjk mlds iSj dk vkWijs'ku fd;k tkuk crk;k x;k gSA fdUrq fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk 'kY; fpfdRlk dh en esa iFkd ls dksbZ jkf'k vihykFkhZ dks ugha fnyokbZ x;h gSA vr% 'kY; fpfdRlk dh en esa ge] 10]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k vihykFkhZ dks iFkd ls fnyok;k tkuk mfpr le>rs gSaA

¶71

18ekeys dh ?kVuk esa fyIr okgu thi la[;k&vkj-ts-&29&Vh&0267 ds pkyd ds ikl oDr ?kVuk mDr iz'uxr okgu thi dks pykus dk oS/k o izHkkoh ijfeV ugha Fkk] tks fd chek ikWfylh dh 'krksZa dk Li"V mYya?ku gSA chek ikWfylh dh 'krksZa ds Li"V mYya?ku ds rF;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ^^is ,.M fjdoj** ds fl)kUr ij chek dEiuh dks vkns'k fn;k x;k gS fd og fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vknsf'kr lEiw.kZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k nkokdrkZ@vihykFkhZ dks vnk djs o mlds mijkar vnk dh xbZ jkf'k dks okgu Lokeh o pkyd] izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 ls olwy dj ysosaA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ^^is ,.M fjdoj** ds laca/k esa tks fu"d"kZ fudkyk x;k gS] mlesa ge dksbZ gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha le>rs gSaA

¶72

19mDrkuqlkj vihykFkhZ@DysesaV fuEu izdkj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gS %&

¶73

Øe la[;k	'kh"kZ@en	bl fu.kZ; ds rgr fu/kkZfjr dh x;h jkf’k¼:i;s esa½
1-	Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; vtZu dh {kerk esa deh ds en esa	2]37]016@&
2-	'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihM+k dh en esa	20]000@&
3-	Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kkvksa dh deh ds en esa	20]000@&
4-	ikSf"Vd vkgkj dh en esa	10]000@&
5-	;krk;kr o ifjogu ij O;; jkf'k ds en esa	5]000@&
6-	bykt ds nkSjku O;; gqbZ jkf'k ds en esa	5]550@&
7-	02 fnol vLirky esa HkrhZ jgus dh en esa	1]200@&
8-	byktjr vof/k ds nkSjku gqbZ 02 ekg vk; dh gkfu ds en esa	12]154@&
9-	'kY; fpfdRlk dh en esa	10]000@&

(11 of 11)

[2026:RJ-JP:5053]

[CMA-224/2010]

bl U;k;ky; }kjk fu/kkZfjr dh xbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k	3]20]920@&
fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk fnyokbZ xbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k¼&½	1]24]350@&
c<+ksrjh i'pkr {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa varj	1]96]570@&

¶78

20rnuqlkj vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy vkaf’kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr iapkV] ftlds }kjk vihykFkhZ@DysesaV dks 1]24]350@& :i;s fnyok;s tkus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] ds LFkku ij 3]20]920@& :i;s dk iapkV ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA mDr jkf'k ij fu;ekuqlkj vk;dj dVkSrh dh tkosxhA vihykFkhZ }kjk iwoZ esa izkIr dh x;h jkf’k dks iapkV jkf’k esa ls lek;ksftr fd;k tkdj 'ks"k jkf’k vihykFkhZ izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ik;k tkrk gSaA

¶79

21bl vkns'k }kjk c<kbZ xbZ lEiw.kZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ij ;kfpdk nk;j djus dh frfFk ls nkokdrkZ@vihykFkhZ] 08 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA

¶80