Single-paragraph order disposing of a civil contempt petition where the petitioner was granted the representation appointment, rendering the petition infructuous.
Rule discharged; petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:6628]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 93/2025
----Petitioners
Versus
[2026:RJ-JP:6628]
[CCP-93/2025]
(2 of 2)
Marg, Jaipur.
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Aditya Pancholi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Ms. Ritika Naruka |
| for Mr. S S Naruka,AAG |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
12/02/2026
It is informed by learned counsel for the respondents that after deciding the representation petitioner has already been granted appointment as prayed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner do not controvert the fact. Accordingly, the instant civil contempt petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of.
The rule is discharged.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
ashu /22
Lokesh Kumar Namdev
Chatanya Prakash Jain
Shekhar Kumar Samaria
Babu Khan
Suresh Kumar
Atik Ahmed
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
