The court restored a civil writ petition dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order, subject to the payment of costs.
Restoration of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10458/2024 subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/-.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:16334]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 37/2025
Sk Finance Limited (Previously Known As S.k. Fincorp Limited), Registered Office At G1 And G2, New Market, Khasa Kothi Circle, Jaipur 302001 Through Authorized Signatory Shri Virendra Singh S/o Rajendra Singh
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Kumar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
17/04/2025
The instant civil writ restoration application under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been preferred for restoration of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10458/2024, which was dismissed by Registrar (Judicial) vide order dated 13.12.2024 on account of non-compliance of the per-emptory order dated 08.11.2024.
Having considered the grounds mentioned in the application and in the interest of justice, the same is allowed and the S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10458/2024 is ordered to be restored
[2025:RJ-JP:16334]
[WRES-37/2025]
(2 of 2)
to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/(One Thousand Rupees).
Rs.1,000/- (One Thousand Rupees) is to be deposited with Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
LALIT MOHAN /105
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the dismissed writ petition should be restored to file after non-compliance with a peremptory order?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sk Finance Limited
Jahid Hussain
Ashfak
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
