Allowed

Hariram S/O Jeetmal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Jul 2025SOSR/192/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the application for suspension of sentence pending the criminal revision. The applicant's sentence was suspended, and he was directed to be released on bail by furnishing personal bonds and sureties to the trial court's satisfaction.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of sentence and release on bail subject to furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Hariram S/O Jeetmal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application

¶3

No.192/2025

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.887/2025

¶6

Hariram S/o Jeetmal, R/o Uandwa Tehsil Ramganjmandi District Kota(Raj.)(At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail Ramganjmandi District Kota)

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶13

14/07/2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that there is no reliable and legally acceptable evidence to hold the accusedapplicant guilty for the alleged offence(s) and there is every likelihood of succeeding in the criminal revision. Learned counsel further submits that accused-applicant was on bail during trial as well as during pendency of appeal and presently he is behind bars. Learned counsel further submits that final hearing of the revision is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶17

(2 of 2) [SOSR-192/2025 in CRLR-887/2025]

¶18

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶19

Without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant.

¶20

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court and affirmed/modified by the learned appellate Court against the accused-applicant namely, Hariram S/o Jeetmal in Criminal Regular Case No.1396/2011 shall remain suspended during pendency of the petition and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 18^th August, 2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

DANISH USMANI /12

Hariram S/O Jeetmal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hariram S/O Jeetmal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yuvraj S/O Kishor Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishan Kumar S/O Shri Durga Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Dr Sunita Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Abdul Hamid S/O Sirazuddin Vs State of Rajasthan

Devilal Son of Panna Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rajveer Singh Urf Neelesh S/O Shri Amar Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan