The High Court of Rajasthan granted relief in a Criminal Revision Petition by quashing proceedings under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita based on the delay in filing the FIR and absence of initial medical evidence in the FIR itself.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:26039]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1403/2023
Rajveer Singh Urf Neelesh S/o Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Mahadev Gali, Ward No. 13, Police Thana Kotwali Bayana, District Bharatpur (Raj.) At Present R/o- 2/167, S.f.s. Agarwal Farm, Mansarover, Police Station Shiprapath, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Monu Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
14/07/2025
;kph@vfHk;qDr jktohj ¼vkxs ^^vfHk;qDr^^ dgk tkosxk½ dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&11] t;iqj egkuxj&izFke }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 81@2022 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 10-08-2023 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS ftlds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDr dks vU; lkFkh vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk&lkFk /kkjk 307@34] 341] 323 Hkk-na-la- ds vkjksi ls vkjksfir fd;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd pksV izfrosnu 12 fnu i'pkr rS;kj gqvk gS] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa eqyfteku uketn ugha gS] gR;k ds iz;kl ds laca/k esa dksbZ lkexzh vfHkys[k ij ugha gS] vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr gksus rFkk vfHk;qDr dks lHkh vkjksiksa ls mUeksfpr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
[2025:RJ-JP:26039]
[CRLR-1403/2023]
(2 of 2)
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mijksDr rdksaZ dk fojks/k djrs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k fof/k&lEer crkrs gq, fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
orZeku ekeys esa ;g vkjksi gS fd vkgr Jo.k viuh eksVjlkbZfdy ij tk jgk Fkk rks ihNs ls dkj esa lokj O;fDr;ksa }kjk vkgr dh gR;k ds vk'k; ls ml ij dkj p<kbZ] vkgr cpdj ikl ds ifjlj esa dwn x;k rks vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk mlds lkFk ykBh vkfn ls ekjihV dhA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vkgr }kjk ;g crk;k gS fd rRle; og mu O;fDr;ksa ds uke Kkr ugha dj ldk] dkykUrj esa /kkjk 161 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds c;kuksa esa vfHk;qDr rFkk vU; lk{kh vfHk;qDrx.k dks uketn fd;k x;k gSA xokg uksgjflag] jkefoykl rFkk lqjs'k izR;{kn'khZ xokgku ds :i esa vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ijhf{kr gq, gSa] ftUgksaus vfHk;qDrx.k dks uketn djrs gq, mijksDr ?kVuk dh iqf"V dh gSA pyrs eksVjlkbZfdy lokj ij dkj p<kdj mldh gR;k ds iz;kl dk vkjksi lqn`< lk{; ds vk/kkj ij cuuk ik;k tkrk gSA
bl izdkj fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k esa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ fof/kd] rF;kRed ,oa {ks=kf/kdkfjrk laca/kh =qfV nf'kZr ugha gksrh gS ,oa gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj izdV ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gS] LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mDr izdkj ls vLohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /31
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to quash proceedings on the grounds of delayed FIR and lack of medical evidence given the alleged offence was outside the timeframe of the BNS.
Whether lack of initial medical evidence automatically bars quashing when witnesses have tendered evidence shortly after.
Rajveer Singh Urf Neelesh
State Of Rajasthan
Sharwan Singh
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
