Allowed

Gopiram Son of Bajrang Lal v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 May 2025SOSR/157/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uma Shanker Vyas, considering counsel submissions that final hearing of revision will take time and merits are questionable, deemed it just to suspend the sentence and grant bail for the period pending the criminal revision petition.

What did the court decide?

Second application for suspension of sentence allowed; sentence suspended; applicant released on bail with personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.

Gopiram Son of Bajrang Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Second Suspension of Sentence Application No. 157/2025

¶3

¶4

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 446/2025

¶5

Gopiram Son of Bajrang Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Bilota Polce Thana Aligarh At Present Sriram Nagar Second Kota Thana Udhyog Nagar Kota District Kota (At Present Confined At District Jail, Sawai Madhopur)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Ms. Faziya G. Khan, Adv., for
	Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan,Adv.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. N.S. Dhakad,P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

09/05/2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the second application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that there is no reliable and legally acceptable evidence to hold the accusedapplicant guilty for the alleged offence(s) and there is every likelihood of succeeding in the criminal revision. Learned counsel further submits that accused-applicant was on bail during trial as well as appeal and presently he is behind bars. Learned counsel

¶16

(2 of 2) [SOSR-157/2025 in CRLR-446/2025]

¶17

further submits that final hearing of the revision is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding second suspension of sentence.

¶19

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

Without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant.

¶21

Accordingly, the second application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court and affirmed by the learned appellate Court against the accused-applicant namely, Gopiram Son of Bajrang Lal in Criminal Case No.147/2016 (56/2014) (CIS No. 3629/2014) shall remain suspended during pendency of the petition and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 12.06.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

YOGESH KUMAR /46

Gopiram Son of Bajrang Lal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopiram Son of Bajrang Lal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rambhajan Son of Gutari Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ramratan Gurjar S/O of Ramkaran Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep @ Kedi Son of Tarachand Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramratan S/O Gangaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mr Krishna Kumar Gupta S/O Mr. Ramdayal Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan

Radhagovind Sharam S/O Madanlal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan