Allowed

Rambhajan Son of Gutari v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 May 2025SOSR/127/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the suspension of sentence application for the petitioner. The trial court sentence and appellate court order are stayed pending the revision petition, subject to bail and bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

The sentence awarded by the trial court and affirmed by the appellate court is suspended during the pendency of the petition, and the petitioner is released on bail with a bond.

Rambhajan Son of Gutari Vs the State of Rajasthan — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. (Suspension of Sentence) Application No.127/2025

¶3

¶4

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.617/2025

¶5

Rambhajan Son of Gutari, Resident Of Liloti Police Station Hindoncity District Karauli Raj (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Bharatpur)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahander Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

08/05/2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that there is no reliable and legally acceptable evidence to hold the accusedapplicant guilty for the alleged offence(s) and there is every likelihood of succeeding in the criminal revision. Learned counsel further submits that accused-applicant was on bail during trial as well as appeal and presently he is behind bars. Learned counsel further submits that final hearing of the revision is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶16

(2 of 2) [SOSR-127/2025 in CRLR-617/2025]

¶17

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

Without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant.

¶19

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court and affirmed/modified by the learned appellate Court against the accused-applicant namely, Rambhajan S/o Gutari in Criminal Regular Case No.178/2001 shall remain suspended during pendency of the petition and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 9^th June, 2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶21

DANISH USMANI /75

Rambhajan Son of Gutari v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rambhajan Son of Gutari v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Prakash Vs Karuna Devi

State of Rajasthan Vs Vishnu Garg S/O Dulichand Garg

Vijendra Singh S/O Shri Rupsingh Vs Sanjeev Chopra S/O Shri Sharvan Kumar Chopra

Ramratan Gurjar S/O of Ramkaran Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep @ Kedi Son of Tarachand Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahaveer Prasad Yadav Vs State