Allowed

Pawan Singh Son of Atar Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Dec 2025SOSA/2475/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appellants convicted by Additional Sessions Judge No. 3, Bharatpur for offences under various IPC sections and Section 3 PDPP Act. Their application to suspend the substantive sentence during pendency of appeal was allowed subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. one lakh each with two sureties of Rs. fifty thousand.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended; appellants released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh each with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 before the trial court.

Pawan Singh Son of Atar Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal SOS Application No. 2475/2025

¶3

¶4

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3183/2025

¶5

Pawan Singh Son Of Atar Singh, R/o Chichana, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.).

¶6

Laxman Singh Son Of Kishan Singh, R/o Chichana, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.).

¶7

Pappu Son Of Hukam Singh, R/o Chichana, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.).

¶8

Veeri Singh Son Of Karan Singh, R/o Chichana, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.).

¶9

Veeri Singh Son Of Mohan Singh, R/o Chichana, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.).

¶10

Prakashvati Wife Of Badan Singh, R/o Chichana, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.).

¶11

Badan Singh Son Of Mohan Singh, R/o Chichana, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.).

¶12

Lakhan Singh Son Of Kishan Singh, R/o Chichana, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.).

¶13

Rajesh Son Of Lakhan Singh, R/o Chichana, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.).

¶14

----Appellants

¶15

Versus

¶16

The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶17

----Respondent

¶18

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Kapil Nagayach, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP

¶19

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶20

09/12/2025

¶21

1- izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 430 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk

¶22

(2 of 3) [CRLA(SOS)-2475/2025]

¶23

fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶24

2- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k la[;k&3] Hkjriqj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 12@2020 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukad 18-11-2025 ds ek/;e ls /kkjk 147] 188@149] 336@149] 342@149] 332@149] 353@149] 427@149 Hkk-na-la- rFkk 3 ih-Mh-ih-ih,DV esa nks"kfl) ?kksf"kr djrs gq, vf/kdre rhu o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl dh ltk ls nafMr fd;k gSA

¶25

3- fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZx.k dk fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa rFkk mls izdj.k esa feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gS] nks"kfl)h gsrq i=koyh ij dksbZ fo'oluh; rFkk fof/kr% Lohdk;Z lqn`< lk{; ugha jgh gS] vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vihy esa vfHk;qDr ds nks"keqDr gksus dh iw.kZ laHkkouk gSA nkSjkus vUoh{kk tekur ij Fkk rFkk orZeku esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mldh ltk LFkfxr dh gqbZ gSA vUr esa ltk LFkfxr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶26

4- mijksDr rdksaZ dk fojks/k djrs gq, ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh] lqn`< lk{; vkfn dks ns[krs gq, ltk LFkxu vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA 5- nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶27

6- izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa] fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ }kjk ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= ds leFkZu esa U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa] izLrqr vihy esa mBk;s x;s dkuwuh eqn~nksa vkfn dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶28

7- ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZx.k 1- iou flag iq= vrj flag] 2- y{e.k flag iq= fd'ku flag] 3- iIiw iq= gqde flag] 4- ohjh flag iq= dj.k flag] 5- ohjh flag iq= eksgu flag] 6- izdk'korh

¶29

[CRLA(SOS)-2475/2025]

¶30

(3 of 3)

¶31

iRuh cnuflag] 7- cnu flag iq= eksgu flag] 8- yk[ku flag iq= fd'ku flag rFkk 9- jkts'k iq= yk[ku flag }kjk vFkZn.M dh lEiw.kZ jkf'k fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa tek djk;s tkus dh 'krZ ij Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn os bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 12-01-2026 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mUgsa vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq izR;sd }kjk ,d yk[k :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks os tekur ij vktkn jgas ,oa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 18-11-2025 ds rgr dkjkokl ds laca/k esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; gksus rd LFkfxr j[kk tkosA

¶32

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶33

Mittal /27(1)

Pawan Singh Son of Atar Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Singh Son of Atar Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narayan S/O Phool Chand Prajapat Vs State of Rajasthan

Toufik Pathan @ Toufik Ali So Shri Muak Bhai Vs State of Rajasthan

Vaibhav Lathigra S/O Shri Kireet Bhai Vs State of Rajasthan

Deepak S/O Chandrapal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramjilal S/O Shri Bherulal Yogi Vs State of Rajasthan

Dr. Subhash Bhardwaj S/O Sh. Harishankar Vs State of Rajasthan