Third suspension-of-sentence application by a convict sentenced under Sections 377 IPC and 5(m)/6 POCSO for an offence against an 11-year-old boy, who has served over four years and completed his studies. The court rejected the application, finding no material change in circumstances warranting suspension.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:19788]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc 3rd Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 234/2025
Ramlakhan S/o Shri Ramdev, R/o Mangli Kalan, Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asgar Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
12/05/2025
izdj.k esa 18 o"kZ ls dqN de vk;q ds fd'kksj }kjk izLrqr r`rh; ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij fo}ku vf/koDrk fd'kksj@izkFkhZ@vihykFkhZ o fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dks lquk x;k ,oa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA ihfMr i{k uksfVl ds ckotwn mifLFkr ugha gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dk fuosnu gS fd fd'kksj djhc pkj o"kZ rhu ekg ls vf/kd dh ltk Hkqxr pqdk gS] uo;qod gS] mlus vfHkj{kk esa jgrs gq, viuk v/;;u iw.kZ dj fMIyksek vkfn vftZr fd;k gS] Hkfo"; esa lq/kjus dk ekSdk fn;k tkuk visf{kr gS] vihy dh lquokbZ esa le; yxsxk] vr% r`rh; ltk LFkxu vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus fuEu U;kf;d fu.kZ; izLrqr fd;s gS%&
[2025:RJ-JP:19788]
[SOSA-234/2025]
(2 of 2)
2& bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk ,dy ihB nkafMd fofo/k f}rh; ltk LFkxu vkosnu la[;k 2159@24 vejpan mQZ pUnw cuke jktLFkku jkT; esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 20-02-25-
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, r`rh; ltk LFkxu vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
n.Mkns'k LFkxu o tekur vkosnu ds ekeyksa esa iwoZ fu.kZ; dk fl)kar dBksjrk ls ykxw ugha gksrk gSA gLrxr izdj.k esa fd'kksj@vfHk;qDr dk o;Ld dh Hkkafr ls'ku@ckyd U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.k dj /kkjk 377 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk o /kkjk 5¼,e½@6 iksDlksa vf/kfu;e ds vijk/k esa nks"kfl) djkj nsrs gq, vf/kdre chl o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl o vFkZn.M ls nafMr fd;k x;k gSA ihfMr ckyd dh vk;q 11 o"kZ Fkh rFkk mldh xqnk esa pksV vkfn ds l a ca/k esa lkexzh vfHkys[k ij jgh gSA
laiw.kZ lk{; o lkexzh dks ns[krs gq, ldkj.k iwoZorhZ n.Mkns'k LFkxu vkosnu [kkfjt fd;k x;k gSA rRi'pkr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ,slk dksbZ lkjoku ifjorZu ugha vk;k gS ftlls iqu% blh U;k;ky; }kjk n.Mkns'k LFkxu vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkosA
izdj.k dh laiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa] i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh] vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq,] bl LVst ij] ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] ;g r`rh; ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugh a gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% fd'kksj@izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ jkey[ku iq= jkenso dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g r`rh; ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gS A
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari Lal Sharma /2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Robin Meena v. State of RajasthanReferred
,l ,y ih ¼fdzfuey½ uacj 5226@24 jksfcin ehuk cuke jktLFkku jkT;
Anjan @ Chan v. State of RajasthanReferred
nkafMd fofo/k f}rh; ltk LFkxu vkosnu la[;k 2159@24 vejpan mQZ pUnw cuke jktLFkku jkT;
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramlakhan S/o Shri Ramdev
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
