The court dismissed the criminal revision petition due to the petitioner's persistent absence despite three adjournments. The order notes that the petitioner is free to file a fresh application if present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:19869]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 231/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
12/05/2025
vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tkus ds vkns'k dks bl ;kfpdk ds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDrx.k@;kphx.k }kjk pqukSrh nh xbZ gSA vkt ;kph dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gS] iwoZ esa Hkh rhu isf'k;ksa ij vuqifLFkfr jgh gSA vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 31-01-2023 dk gSA
pwafd ;kph dh fujarj vuqifLFkfr mldh v:fp dks n'kkZrh gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vuqifLFkfr o vfHk;kstu ds vHkko esa [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk layXu LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA
[2025:RJ-JP:19869]
[CRLR-231/2023]
(2 of 2)
;fn okLro esa ;kph i{k :fpc) gks] rks bl ;kfpdk dks uacj ij ysus gsrq iqu% uohu vkosnu is'k djus gsrq Lora= gksxkA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /38
Mohammad Arshad
Ahmed @ Aahmed Miya
State Of Rajasthan
Rajendra Prasad
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
