Allowed

Jagdish Son of Shri Hanuman Chula v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Dec 2025SOSA/2236/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the applicant's petition for suspension of sentence pending appeal under Section 430 CrPC. The conviction was set aside by the Trial Court subject to furnishing bonds, and the sentence suspension was granted pending the final decision of the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of sentence pending appeal allowed upon execution of bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Jagdish Son of Shri Hanuman Chula Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:49214]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 2236/2025

¶4

¶5

S. B. Criminal Appeal No. 2928/2025

¶6

Jagdish Son Of Shri Hanuman Chula, Resident Of Village Khandel, Police Staiton Phulera, Jaipur Rural. (At Present At Central Jail, Jaipur)

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kamlendra Sihag, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Judgment / Order

¶14

03/12/2025

¶15

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 430 ch,u,l,l ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶16

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k] tkyh uksV izdj.k] t;iqj egkuxj&izFke }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 21@2019 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukad 03-11-2025 ds ek/;e ls /kkjk 489ch] 489lh Hkk-na-la- esa nks"kfl) ?kksf"kr djrs gq, vf/kdre 05 o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl dh ltk ls nafMr fd;k gSA

¶17

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gSa rFkk mls izdj.k esa feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gS] nks"kfl)h gsrq i=koyh ij dksbZ lqn`< lk{; ugha jgh gS] nkSjkus vUoh{kk tekur ij

[2025:RJ-JP:49214]

[SOSA-2236/2025]

(2 of 2)

Fkk] vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vihy esa vfHk;qDr ds nks"keqDr gksus dh iw.kZ laHkkouk gS] djhc 06 ekg dh ltk Hkqxr pqdk gS] vUr esa ltk LFkfxr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶22

mijksDr rdksaZ dk fojks/k djrs gq, ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh] lqn`< lk{; vkfn dks ns[krs gq, ltk LFkxu vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶23

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶24

izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa] fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ }kjk ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= ds leFkZu esa U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa] izLrqr vihy esa mBk;s x;s dkuwuh eqn~nksa] vfHk;qDr dh U;kf;d vfHkj{kk vof/k vkfn dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶25

ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr txnh'k iq= guqeku pwyk dh vksj ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vf/kjksfir lEiw.kZ vFkZn.M dh jkf'k fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa tek djk;s tkus dh 'krZ ij Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 06-01-2026 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos ,oa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 03-11-2025 ds rgr dkjkokl ds laca/k esa fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; gksus rd LFkfxr j[kk tkosA

¶26

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶27

Murari Lal Sharma /23

Jagdish Son of Shri Hanuman Chula v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish Son of Shri Hanuman Chula v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Meena Alias Raku Son of Tarachand Meena, Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhojraj S/O Baluram Vs State of Rajasthan

Shishupal Gurjar S/O Nanakram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra S/O Shri Kanhaiyalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilshad Urf Golu S/O Shri Ashfaq Vs State of Rajasthan

Harpal Singh Son of Shri Balwant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan