Allowed

Mahendra S/O Shri Kanhaiyalal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Dec 2025CRLMB/9908/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uma Shanker Vyas granted bail to two petitioners accused of agricultural fraud involving Rs. 97 lakhs extracted from an elderly couple by coercing them to sell their property. The court found the accused influential and necessary for witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the two petitioners with liberty to be surrendered and examined as necessary witnesses.

Mahendra S/O Shri Kanhaiyalal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:49078]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9908/2025

¶4

Mahendra S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ghana, Police Station Bhinay, Distt. Ajmer, Rajasthan (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Beawar).

¶5

Sanwarlal S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ghana, Police Station Bhinay, Distt. Ajmer, Rajasthan (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Beawar).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. Rahul Agarwal, Adv.
	Mr. Shabaj Naqwi, Adv.
	Ms. Rabiya Mateen, Adv.
	Mr. Karan Singh, IO Bijay Nagar, Present in Person.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

03/12/2025

¶14

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= /kkjk 483 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk &fct;uxj] C;koj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &235@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 311] 331¼6½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk esa is’k fd;k x;k gSA

¶15

xr vkns'k dh ikyuk esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh Jh dj.k flag] Fkkukf/kdkjh fct;uxj mifLFkr vk;s] ftUgksaus fuosnu fd;k fd izorZu funs'kky; rFkk vk;dj foHkkx dks U;k;ky; ds vkns'k dh ikyuk esa lwpuk nh tk pqdh gSA bl izdkj vkns'k dh ikyuk gks tkus ls vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh

[CRLMB-9908/2025]

[2025:RJ-JP:49078]

(2 of 3)

dks O;fDrxr mifLFkfr ls NwV iznku dh tkrh gS rFkk mUgsa cdk;k vuqla/kku ;Fkk'kh?kz djus dk funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gSA

¶20

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k us rdZ fn;k fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa] mUgsa izdj.k esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) tks dgkuh crk;h gS] og dkYifud o feF;k gSA ;g Hkh fuosnu fd;k fd izdj.k esa muds fo:) vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] fnukad 10-07-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSa] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶21

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh us vfHk;qDrx.k ds vkijkf/kd fjdkMZ] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ,d= lkexzh] vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶22

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds laca/k esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶23

gLrxr ekeys esa nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k ij ;g vkjksi gS fd mUgksaus vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj ifjoknh ds QkeZ gkml ij j[ks 97]00]000@& :i;s dh MdSrh ds vuqdze esa ogka dk;Zjr deZpkfj;ksa ds lkFk ekjihV dh rFkk mDr jkf'k dks ywV dj ys x;sA nkSjkus vuqla/kku nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk nh x;h bfRryk ds vuqlkj la;qDr :i ls 35-43 yk[k :i;s cjken gq, gSa] vU; vfHk;qDrx.k vHkh Qjkj gSa rFkk mudh fxjQ~rkjh o vuqla/kku gksuk 'ks"k crk;k gSA

¶24

vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vkjksi vR;f/kd xaHkhj gSa] cdk;k vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vuqla/kku vkSj cjkenxh vkfn 'ks"k gS] bl LVst ij vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k x;k rks cdk;k vuqla/kku foijhr :i ls izHkkfor gks ldrk gSA

¶25

vr% izLrqr rdks a Z] izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) yafcr iwoZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ,oa muds fo:) yxk;s x;s vk{ksiksa dh xaHkhjrk vkfn dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, bl izdze ij izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij

[2025:RJ-JP:49078]

[CRLMB-9908/2025]

(3 of 3)

foospu fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶30

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶31

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶32

Mittal /14(7)

Mahendra S/O Shri Kanhaiyalal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra S/O Shri Kanhaiyalal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Meena Alias Raku Son of Tarachand Meena, Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhojraj S/O Baluram Vs State of Rajasthan

Shishupal Gurjar S/O Nanakram Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilshad Urf Golu S/O Shri Ashfaq Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Son of Shri Hanuman Chula Vs State of Rajasthan

Harpal Singh Son of Shri Balwant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan