Allowed

Naresh Kumar S/O Tilak Raj v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Oct 2025SOSA/2014/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the petition for suspension of sentence arising from a corruption conviction, directing the grant of bail to the petitioner while his sentence appeal is pending, noting the petitioner's innocence and prior bail.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; sentence suspended; respondent directed to release petitioner on bail and vacate custody until appeal outcome.

Naresh Kumar S/O Tilak Raj Vs State of Rajasthan — Corruption | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:41276]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 2014/2025

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2693/2025

¶6

Naresh Kumar S/o Tilak Raj, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Kishangarhbas Basda Road, Tehsil Kishangarhbas, District Alwar, (Raj.) In Custody In District Jail Alwar

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rahtore, Addl.G.A.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

¶13

Order

¶14

10/10/2025

¶15

1- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ujs'k dqekj dh vksj ls /kkjk 430 ch-,u-,l-,l- ¼/kkjk 389 na-iz-la-½ ds varxZr] fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky;& Sessions Judge, Special Court, Anti Corruption Cases, Alwar (Raj) ds }kjk fu;fer QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k& 10@2017] muoku jktLFkku jkT; cuke ujs'k dqekj o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 17-09-2025] ftlds }kjk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 7] /kkjk 13¼1½¼Mh½ lifBr /kkjk 13¼2½ Hkz"Vkpkj fuokj.k vf/kfu;e] 1988 rFkk /kkjk 120ch Hkknl esa nks"kfl) dj 10]000@& #i;s ds vFkZn.M lfgr vf/kdre 4 o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ls rFkk vne vnk;xh vFkZnaM ,d o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) ;g ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

[2025:RJ-JP:41276]

[SOSA-2014/2025]

(2 of 3)

2- fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls fu;e 311 jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; fu;ekoyh] 1952 dk izek.k i= i=koyh esa layXu fd;k x;k gSA

¶20

3- cgl lquh xbZA

¶21

4- fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk dFku gS fd izLrqr ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS rFkk mls bl izdj.k esa >wBk lafyIr fd;k x;k gS] i=koyh ij mls nks"kfl) djus gsrq i;kZIr lk{; miyC/k ugha gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dk fof/klEer ,oa lw{erk ls foospu fd, fcuk gh vkyksP; vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] tks fd fof/klEer ugha gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izdj.k esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls u rks dksbZ jkf'k cjken gqbZ gS vkSj u gh ifjoknh dk dksbZ dk;Z yafcr ugha Fkk] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd xokgku ds c;kuksa esa Hkh vkil esa xaHkhj fojks/kkHkkl gS] mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izdj.k ds lg&vfHk;qDr dh ltk bl U;k;ky; }kjk S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1900/2025 esa fnukad 09-10-2025 dks LFkfxr dh tk pqdh gS rFkk fopkj.k ds nkSjku izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr tekur ij vktkn Fkk ,oa og fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; fnukad 17-09-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gS] mldk dksbZ iwoZorhZ vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ ugha gS] vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ltk LFkxu@tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkosA

¶22

5- fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k djrs gq;s mls [kkfjt djus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶23

6- i=koyh dk lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k rFkk mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij xaHkhjrkiwoZd euu fd;kA

¶24

7- izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk izLrqr rdksZa] vfHkj{kk vof/k rFkk vihy esa mBk, x, dkuwuh eqn~nksa ,oa vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,

¶25

[2025:RJ-JP:41276]

¶26

[SOSA-2014/2025]

¶27

izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA 8- ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ujs'k dqekj iq= fryd jkt dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa 25]000&25000@&:i, ¼v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj nsa fd og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 11-11-2025 dks ,oa rRi'pkr~ tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk] rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ds rgr fn, x, dkjkokl ds n.Mkns'k ¼sentence½ dh fØ;kfUorh dks bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkos ,oa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks bl izdj.k esa vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶28

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J

¶29

RAHUL KUMAR KHANDELWAL /43(S)

Naresh Kumar S/O Tilak Raj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar S/O Tilak Raj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hawa Singh Son of Shri Jaimal Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Pappulal Saini S/O Shri Dhannalal Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Laxmi Narayan S/O Shri Munga Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Charanjeet Maheshwari Vs Smt Garima Maheshwari and Anr.

Jamnalal Meghwal Son of Shri Laxmiram Meghwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravindra Singh Shekhawat S/O Amar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan