Writ petition by the Sub-Registrar concerning a monetary amount; counsel for the petitioner stated on instructions that the amount involved had been deposited by the respondents. The Division Bench disposed of the writ petition as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:26035-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9283/2009
State of Rajasthan, through Sub-Registrar, Jhalawar (Jhalarapatan), Department of Registration & Stamps.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Kartikeya Sharma for |
|---|---|
| Mr. SandeepTaneja,AAG | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Vibhanshu Sharma for |
| Ms. Anita Aggarwal |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order
14/07/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions submitted that the amount involve in this matter has already been deposited by the respondent/s.
In that view of the matter, the present writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
(ANAND SHARMA),J
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
DIVYA /72
State of Rajasthan, through Sub-Registrar, Jhalawar (Jhalarapatan), Department of Registration & Stamps
Sudhir Khandelwal S/o Shri Gopal Das Khandelwal
Board of Revenue, Ajmer
Mukesh Chelawat S/o Roopchand Jain
Inderjeet Singh
Anand Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
