State appeal against a writ respondent; counsel conceded the issue was already covered by a co-ordinate bench decision in State of Rajasthan vs Vinod Kumar Meena, and the appeal was dismissed in terms of that judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:25711-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 536/2025
----Appellants
Versus
Bhanu Pratap Singh Son Of Kalyan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Shyopur, Malpura, District Tonk (Raj).
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma, AAAG For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order
11/07/2025
Defect(s) pointed out by the Office are waived.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants fairly submits that the issue involved in this appeal has already been considered and decided by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Vinod Kumar Meena (D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.61/2024) decided on 05.04.2024.
In view of the above judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan (supra) , the present appeal stands dismissed.
(ANAND SHARMA),J
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh /296
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Vinod Kumar MeenaFollowed
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.61/2024 decided on 05.04.2024
State of Rajasthan, through its Home Secretary
The Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Jaipur
The Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jodhpur
The District Education Officer (Elementary), District Jodhpur
Bhanu Pratap Singh
Inderjeet Singh
Anand Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
