Petitioner challenged her ANM transfer order before the Tribunal, which rejected her husband-wife posting claim but allowed a representation. As representation was under consideration with respondents, counsel withdrew the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:19515]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7073/2025
Geeta Devi Wife Of Shri Thawarmal, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Village Tateeja, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surya Prakash Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
08/05/2025
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:19515]
[CW-7073/2025]
place, however the Tribunal has considered such ground on merits and does not find favour to petitioner yet the Tribunal has granted liberty to petitioner to submit a representation before the respondents, which has been directed to be decided within a period of 30 days.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
TN/13
Geeta Devi Wife Of Shri Thawarmal, Aged About 49 Years
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Services Department
Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur
Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Block Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan
Medical Officer, P.H.C., Jasrapur, Block Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
