Dismissed

Ram Lakhan Meena v. U O I and Ors.

Rajasthan HC4 Nov 2025CW/5825/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In connected writ petitions regarding the petitioner's employment or service, the High Court of Rajasthan allowed the petitioner's application to withdraw the petitions. The court dismissed the writ petitions as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition if an occasion arises in the future.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw writ petitions with liberty to file a fresh petition if an occasion so arises in the future.

Ram Lakhan Meena Vs U O I and Ors. — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:44387]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11398/2016

¶4

Ram Lakhan Meena son of Shri Ram Kishore Meena, aged about 42 years, resident of 582, Ground Floor, Rani Sati Nagar, Janpath Lone-5, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Human Resources

¶8

& Development, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi

¶9

Central University of Rajasthan through its Registrar having its Office at National Highway No.8, Bandar Sindari Kishangarh-305817 District Ajmer (Raj.)

¶10

Satyawati College, University of Delhi through its Principal, Ashok Vihar, Phase-III, Delhi - 110052

¶11

Prof. A.K. Pujari, Vice Chancellor, Central University of Rajasthan, National Highway No.8, Bandar Sindari Kishangarh-305817 District Ajmer (Raj.)

¶12

Mr. K.V.S. Kameswara Rao, Registrar, Central University of Rajasthan National Highway No.8, Bandar Sindari Kishangarh-305817 District Ajmer (Raj.)

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

Connected With

¶15

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5825/2016

¶16

Ram Lakhan Meena son of Shri Ram Kishore Meena, aged about 42 years, resident of 582, Ground Floor, Rani Sati Nagar, Janpath Lone-5, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur

¶17

----Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Human Resources

¶20

& Development, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi

¶21

Central University of Rajasthan through its Registrar having its Office at National Highway No.8, Bandar Sindari Kishangarh-305817 District Ajmer (Raj.)

¶22

Satyawati College, University of Delhi through its Principal, Ashok Vihar, Phase-III, Delhi - 110052

¶23

----Respondents

¶24

For Petitioner(s)

¶25

: Mr. Rakesh Dhawan, Advocate for Mr. Tanveer Ahmad, Advocate

¶26

(2 of 2) [CW-11398/2016/5825/2016]

¶27

[2025:RJ-JP:44387]

¶28

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Pareek, Advocate

¶29

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order

¶30

04/11/2025

¶31

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11398/2016

¶32

Matter has come up on an application bearing Inward No.1/2025 dt. 07.10.2025 filed by the petitioner praying therein for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter with the authority concerned.

¶33

For the reasons & grounds mentioned therein, the application is allowed.

¶34

Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition, if an occasion, so arises in future.

¶35

Pending application, if any, also stands dismissed.

¶36

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5825/2016

¶37

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, if an occasion so arises in future.

¶38

Permission as sought for is granted.

¶39

The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn

¶40

with the aforesaid liberty.

¶41

Pending application, if any, also stands dismissed.

¶42

Let a copy of this order be placed in connected file.

¶43

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶44

ASHOK

Ram Lakhan Meena v. U O I and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Lakhan Meena v. U O I and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rewati Prasad S/O Nathhi Lal (Since Deceased) Vs the State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Medical and Health Department

Mukesh Kumar Bairwa Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Ex-Hc/Gd Rameshwar Prasad Bunkar S/O Shri Ramji Lal of 21 Bn. Crpf Vs Union of India

Mahesh Chandra Gupta Vs State Water Resources Depors

Krishan Kumar Son of Shri Satveer Vs State of Rajasthan through Its Secretary, Medical and Health Department

Naveen Chand Bhandari Vs J v v N Ltd. and Anr.