Ram Kumar v. State of Raj and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel for the petitioner stated he received no instructions to press the writ petition and the petitioner did not appear; the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to revive.
Counsel for the petitioner stated he received no instructions to press the writ petition and the petitioner did not appear; the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to revive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:17007]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2847/2004
Ram Kumar S/o Shri Pachuram, resident of Dhundali, Tehsil, Bhuri Bhadaz, Panchayat Samiti, Kotputli, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order
22/04/2025
(ANAND SHARMA),J
DAKSH/17
Ram Kumar
Government of Rajasthan through Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Jaipur
Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Bhari Bhandal, Panchayat Samiti, Kotputli, District Jaipur
Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Kotputli, District Jaipur
Anand Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court