Petitioner sought compassionate appointment in place of his deceased father; application pending over five years with no decision. Court directed respondents to decide the application by a speaking order within two months and disposed of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:16822]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8598/2023
Avinash Guganiya son of late Shri Mamraj, aged about 27 Years, resident of Plot No. 55, behind Maneesh School, Balaji Dharm Kanta, Harmada, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anima Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Krishma Soni on behalf of Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order
21/04/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:16822]
[CW-8598/2023]
(2 of 2)
taken by the respondents over the application filed by the petitioner.
(ANAND SHARMA),J
DAKSH/247
1 issue framed by the court
Should the respondents be directed to decide the petitioner's pending application for compassionate appointment on the death of his father?
Avinash Guganiya
The State of Rajasthan
The Commissioner, Rajasthan Police, Jaipur Commissionerate
Anand Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
