Petitioner withdrew the writ petition; the petition and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn by the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:36671]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2791/2015
Padam Chand (Lal) Chug S/o Shri Pedaram Chug aged about 70 years R/o Danmal Ji Ka Ahata, Kota Junction, Kota (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Shakuntalal Bai w/o Shri Om Prakash Jain, R/o Kasim Gali, Kota Junction, Kota (Raj.)
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Patni for Mr. P.S. Shukla For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
10/09/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the instant writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Karan/123
Padam Chand (Lal) Chug
Smt. Shakuntalal Bai
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
