Disposed

Ent Bhatta Sangh Bharatpur v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Sept 2025CW/13621/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition sought direction to the respondents to decide a representation submitted by the petitioner. The Court directed the authorities to decide the representation expeditiously within four weeks while clarifying that the petitioner remains free to decide the matter in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to respondents to decide the representation expeditiously within four weeks.

Ent Bhatta Sangh Bharatpur Vs State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:36515]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13621/2025

¶4

Ent Bhatta Sangh Bharatpur, Through Its President Narendra Talan, Son Of Shri Vinod Kumar, Aged About 45 Years, Office Kumher Road, Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) Pin-321602

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Mines And Geology, Secretariat, Jaipur

¶8

Joint Secretary, Govt Of Rajasthan, Mines (Group-2) Department, Secretariat, Jaipur

¶9

Director, Department Of Mines And Geology, Udaipur, Rajasthan

¶10

Mining Engineer, Department Of Mines And Geology, Bharatpur, Rajasthan

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

: Ms.Priyansha Gupta

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶15

Order

¶16

10/09/2025

¶17

For a limited prayer, the instant writ petition has been preferred seeking direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 03.07.2025 submitted by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the in spite of passing of considerable time, till date, the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by the Authorities concerned, therefore, appropriate direction be issued to the Authorities to decide the same expeditiously as early as possible within a time frame.

[2025:RJ-JP:36515]

[CW-13621/2025]

(2 of 2)

Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with directions to the Authorities concerned to decide the representation expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶22

With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶23

Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same, strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order.

¶24

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶25

Aayush Sharma /41

Ent Bhatta Sangh Bharatpur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ent Bhatta Sangh Bharatpur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Liyakat Agwan S/O Sh. Fakhru Bhai Vs State of Rajasthan

Sumitra Saini W/O Shri Ashok Kumar Saini Vs Suman Sharma W/O Shri Raju @ Rajesh Sharma

Shwetabh Singhal, S/O Sh. Rakesh Singhal Vs M/S J.K and Sons

Rakesh Agarwal S/O Shri Hanuman Prasad Agarwal Vs Shri Gopal Singh Chauhan S/O Shri Chandrapal Singh Chauhan

Rama Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Padam Chand Lal Vs Smt Shakuntalal Bai