Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as neither petitioner nor counsel appeared in two consecutive rounds, indicating loss of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:40425]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21352/2018
Badrilal Meena, S/o Lt. Shri Motilal Meena, Aged About 75 Years, R/o- Village- Khediyaman, Gram Panchayat- Rebarpura, TehsilIndragarh, District- Bundi
----Petitioner
Versus
Kavita Meena W/o Babu Lal Meena, R/o Sabalpura, Panchayat Samiti Nainwa, Teh. Bundi, Distt. Bundi 323803
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
06/10/2025
No one has put in appearance on behalf of petitioner even in second round.
Perhaps, the petitioner has lost his interest in pursuing this civil writ petition.
Accordingly, this civil writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
LALIT MOHAN /64
Badrilal Meena
Kavita Meena
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
