Writ petition filed against recovery proceedings initiated by the Bank. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:13258]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1834/2006
Ritesh Patni Son Of Shri Satish Kumar Patni, aged 32 years, Resident Of 872, Patni Bhawan, Khuteton Ka Rasta, 1St Crossing Kishanpole Bazaar Jaipur, Proprietor M/s Vijay Laxmi Traders.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order
24/03/2025
On 18.01.2024, i.e., when the case reached hearing last, following order was passed:
“This petition was filed aggrieved of the recovery proceedings initiated by the respondent-Bank.
None appears for parties.
Let counsel for petitioner apprise the Court with regard to the current status of the loan account and proceedings initiated if any under “Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act”.
Today also, none appears for the petitioner even in second round.
[2025:RJ-JP:13258]
[CW-1834/2006]
(2 of 2)
In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
DIKSHA /48
Ritesh Patni
Union Bank Of India
Branch Manager, Union Bank Of India
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
