Disposed

Amikesh S/O Shri Birdi Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Nov 2025CW/17324/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A government school Principal challenged his transfer order, citing reliance on a Division Bench order regarding posting near a spouse in government service. The court disposed of the petition directing him to file a representation, to be decided within 30 days with a reasoned order, and stayed the transfer till then.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to submit representation within 30 days; respondents to decide it by reasoned speaking order within 30 days and communicate decision; transfer order dated 22.09.2025 stayed till representation

Amikesh S/O Shri Birdi Chand Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:45956]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17324/2025

¶4

Amikesh S/o Shri Birdi Chand, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Gujaro Ki Dhani Village Alkhapura Godaran Post Dhinwa Jatan Tehsil Laxmangarh District Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur

¶8

The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶9

The Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Bidodi Badi District Sikar.

¶10

Om Prakash, Principal At Govt. Senior Secondary School, Bidodi Badi District Sikar.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. SandeepKalwaniya
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with
	Ms. Pooja Sharma and
	Mr. Vishal Kumar

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

¶14

Order

¶15

14/11/2025

¶16

Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with

¶17

following prayer:-

¶18

“i) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the Impugned order dated 22.09.2025 and relieving order dated 25.09.2025 (Annex.1 and 2) may kindly be quashed and set aside.

¶19

ii) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the respondents be directed to continue the petitioner on the post of Principal in Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Bidodi Badi Dist. Sikar.

¶20

iii) Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner.”

[2025:RJ-JP:45956]

[CW-17324/2025]

(2 of 3)

Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 27.02.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No.332/2025 : Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the wife of the petitioner is posted in the District of Deedwana-Kuchaman and the present petitioner is transferred from Govt. Senior School, Bidodi Badi, Dist. Sikar to Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Khuiyala Dist. Jaisalmer. He also submits that it is duty of the respondents that the petitioner be transferred to the same place where his wife is working, who is also a Government servant.

¶25

Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents and he submits that due to administrative exigency the transfer has been effected but considering the grievance as raised by the petitioner, the petitioner is free to make a representation to the Department, which will consider the representation on the grounds raised by the petitioner and this petition can be disposed at this stage.

¶26

Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondentsAuthority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the

[2025:RJ-JP:45956]

[CW-17324/2025]

(3 of 3)

petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.

¶31

In the meanwhile, impugned order dated 22.09.2025 qua the present petitioner shall remain stayed till disposal of the representation, by the respondents.

¶32

With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

¶33

(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J

¶34

PREETI VALECHA /372

Amikesh S/O Shri Birdi Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amikesh S/O Shri Birdi Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Son of Bholaram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Kavita Kumari Meena Daughter of Shri Ramdayal Meena Wife of Shri Mukesh Kumar Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Amit Sanchoriya Son of Shri Chhotu Ram Sanchoriya Vs State of Rajasthan

Sampat Singh Lodha Son of Late Shri Sohan Lal Lodha Vs Rajasthan Agriculture Marketing Board

Ms. Sheril Gupta D/O Vishnu Gopal Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan

Rameshwar Lal Son of Shri Nanu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan