Petitioner claimed pension benefits were paid. Noting compliance, this writ petition was disposed of without substantive findings on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:42331]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17015/2018
Hari Prasad Sharma S/o Sh. Kalyan Mal Ji, Aged About 77 Years, R/o Village Banuda, Tehsil Danta Ramgarh, District Sikar.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
16/10/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the payment of pension/retiral benefits dues has already been made to the petitioner(s) by the respondent(s).
In view of above, nothing remain survives in the present petition and the same is hereby disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
SAURABH /13
Hari Prasad Sharma
State Of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharvani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
