Disposed

Rc Power Project Limited v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Apr 2025CW/16107/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Respondents' applications to vacate an interim order were considered; the Advocate General offered to withdraw the impugned notice with liberty to proceed in accordance with law. The court held the writ petitions did not survive and disposed them of, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition if any fresh notice is issued.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions disposed of; liberty reserved to file fresh writ petition if a fresh notice is issued.

Rc Power Project Limited Vs State of Rajasthan — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:15569]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16119/2024

¶4

Rc Power Project Limited, (Formerly Known As R.c. Enterprises), P.no. B4/32, South Part Chitrakoot, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur302021 (Raj.), Through Its Authorized Person- Mr. Ramesh Choudhary, Director.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Energy, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶8

Chairman And Managing Director, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath Jaipur.

¶9

Superintendent Engineer (Tw), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Old Power House, Near Ram Mandir, Banipark, Jaipur.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16107/2024

¶13

Rc Power Project Limited, (Formerly Known As R.c. Enterprises), P.no. B4/32, South Part Chitrakoot, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur302021 (Raj.). Through Its Authorized Person- Mr. Ramesh Choudhary, Director.

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Energy, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶17

Chairman And Managing Director, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur.

¶18

Superintendent Engineer (Tw), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Old Power House, Near Ram Mandir, Banipark, Jaipur.

¶19

----Respondents

¶20

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi Mr. Aditya Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, AG with Mr. Umang Gupta Mr. Rachit Somani Mr. Dheeraj Mathur

¶21

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order

¶22

08/04/2025

¶23

Two separate applications (IA No.1/2025) were filed on behalf of the respondents for vacation of order dated 15.10.2024.

[2025:RJ-JP:15569]

[CW-16119/2024]

(2 of 2)

Learned Advocate General appearing for respondents submits that he is ready to withdraw the impugned notice with liberty to proceed further in accordance with law.

¶28

In view of above submissions, prayer made in these writ petitions does not survive anymore.

¶29

Accordingly, these civil writ petitions as well as pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

¶30

However, petitioners would be at liberty to file fresh writ petition if any fresh notice is issued by the respondents.

¶31

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶32

GAUTAM JAIN /114-115

Rc Power Project Limited v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rc Power Project Limited v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Kumar Meena S/O Ramhari Vs State of Rajasthan

Laxmi Kant @ Lucky Rana S/O Shri Nandlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Iddi @ Iddar @ Idrish S/O Changa Vs State of Rajasthan

Shahrukh S/O Yusuf Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Kumar S/O Ramniwas Vs State of Rajasthan

Radha Mohan Builders Pvt. Ltd. and Vs State of Raj and Ors.