Per diem order dismissing a civil writ petition for want of prosecution after the petitioners failed to appear despite two chances to present their case.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of petitioners in two rounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:45047]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13402/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : None Present |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
10/11/2025
Perusal of the file would reveal that on last occasion, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. However, in the interest of justice, one more opportunity was granted to the petitioners to present their case but today also, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners even in second round.
[2025:RJ-JP:45047]
[CW-13402/2020]
(2 of 2)
Perhaps, petitioners have lost interest in this civil writ
petition.
Accordingly, this civil writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
LALIT MOHAN /10
Ram Jethanand Tanwani
Chetan Haridas Mapara
Hemendra Mapara Haridas
Kalpesh Purshottam Shah
Union Of India
Registrar Of Companies
Anil Kumar Upanman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
