Disposed

Gadul Devi D/O Shri Heeralal, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 May 2025CRLW/539/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An adult interfaith couple petitioned for police protection against threats from family members opposed to their relationship. Relying on constitutional guarantees of personal liberty and established judicial decisions, the court directed the Superintendent of Police, Tonk to consider their request and act to protect them if threat is found.

What did the court decide?

Direction to SP, Tonk to consider protection request and ensure no harm to petitioners' life and liberty if threat is ascertained.

Gadul Devi D/O Shri Heeralal, Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:18605]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 539/2025

¶4

Gadul Devi D/o Shri Heeralal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Jodhpuriya, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk, Rajasthan.

¶5

Jeetram Gurjar S/o Shri Ramdev Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Ranoli, Tehsil Peeplu, District Tonk, Rajasthan.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶9

The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶10

The Superintendent Of Police, Tonk.

¶11

The Sho, Police Station Jharana, District Tonk.

¶12

Kajod S/o Suja, Residing At Bichi, Police Station Madhorajpura, District Jaipur.

¶13

Ganesh S/o Shankar, Residing At Bichi, Police Station Madhorajpura, District Jaipur.

¶14

Rodu S/o Chanda, Residing At Bichi, Police Station Madhorajpura, District Jaipur.

¶15

Jeetram S/o Rodu, Residing At Bichi, Police Station Madhorajpura, District Jaipur.

¶16

Mohanlal S/o Mulya, R/o Vimalpura, Police Station Phagi, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur.

¶17

Nandaram S/o Bhairu, R/o Hameriya, Police Station Peeplu, District Tonk.

¶18

----Respondents

¶19

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. J S Rathore, PP

¶20

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

Order

[2025:RJ-JP:18605]

[CRLW-539/2025]

(2 of 3)

02/05/2025

;g fjV ;kfpdk ;kphx.k dh vksj ls v;kph la[;k 5 ls 10 dh vksj ls mUgsa tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk iSnk djus dh /kefd;ka feyus ds dkj.k v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 4 dks mUgsa lqj{kk iznku djus ds funsZ'k fn, tkus gsrq izLrqr dh gSA

¶27

nksuksa i{kksa dks ;kfpdk ij lquk x;kA

¶28

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kphx.k dk rdZ gS fd ;kfpdkdkj o;Ld gSa rFkk ;kph la[;k&1 xMqy dh tUe frfFk 01-01-1997 ,oa ;kph la[;k&2 thrjke dh tUe frfFk 17-12-2001 gS] tks fd muds vk/kkj dkMZ dh izfr ls Li"Vr% izdV gks jgh gSA bl izdkj ls os nksuksa o;Ld gSa vkSj fyo&bu&fjys'kuf'ki esa jg jgs gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd ;kphx.k 'kkafriwoZd fuokl dj jgs gSa rFkk v;kph la[;k 5 ls 10 tks ;kph la[;k&1 ds ifjokj ds lnL; gSa] blls [kq'k ugha gSa vkSj /kefd;ka ns jgs gSaA mDr v;kphx.k ls ;kphx.k dks tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd mUgksaus U;k;ky; esa ;g ;kfpdk izLrqr djus ls iwoZ v;kph la[;k&3 iqfyl v/kh{kd Vksad dks lqj{kk iznku djus gsrq i= iathd`r Mkd ls fHktok fn;k gS] tks ifjf'k"V&3 gSA vr% ;kphx.k dks iqfyl lqj{kk iznku dh tkosA

¶29

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶30

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us fookfgr tksM+ksa dh lqj{kk ds lEcU/k esa U;kf;d fofu'p; izdk'k flag ,oa vU;&cuke&;wfu;u vkWQ bf.M;k esa funZs'k fn, gSa rFkk vuqPNsn 21 Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ,oa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d fofu'p; yrk flag&cuke&mRrj izns'k jkT; ,vkbZvkj 2006 ,llh 2522] ,l[kq'kcw&cuke&dUukbZEey 2010 ¼5½ ,llhlh 600] bUnzk ljek& cuke&ohdsoh ljek ¼2013½ 15 ,llhlh 755 rFkk 'kQhu tgku&cuke&vlksdu ds,e ,oa vU; ¼2018½ 16 ,llhlh 368 esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd, x, gSa fd izR;sd o;Ld O;fDr viuh bPNkuq:i jgus dks Lora= gSA fof/k }kjk LFkkfir izfØ;k ds vfrfjDr muds thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk dk guu djus dk fdlh dks vf/kdkj ugha gSA os dkuwu ds varxZr vius thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk ds izfr laj{k.k izkIr djus ds

¶31

[2025:RJ-JP:18605]

¶32

[CRLW-539/2025]

¶33

vf/kdkjh gSa] Hkys gh nks o;Ld O;fDr;ksa d s vkilh lEcU/k vlkekftd ekus tkosaA blds vfrfjDr jktLFkku iqfyl vf/kfu;e 2007 dh /kkjk 29 ds vuqlkj izR;sd iqfyl vf/kdkjh dk ;g drZO; gS fd og ukxfjdksa ds thou o O;fDrxr Lora=rk dh j{kk djsA

¶34

gLrxr izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjLFkfr;ksa esa ;kphx.k ds dFkuksa dh lnHkkfodrk o lR;rk ds laca/k esa dksbZ fVIi.kh o fu"d"kZ fn;s fcuk rFkk mDr fof/kd fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 4 dks ;g funsZ'k fn, tkrs gSa fd os ;kphx.k dh vksj ls v;kph la[;k&3 dks izsf"kr i= ifjf'k"V&3 dks fopkj (consider) esa yk,a o ;kphx.k dh dfFkr vlqj{kk ds laca/k esa vkdyu ds i'pkr vlqj{kk dk rRo ik;s tkus ij fu;ekuqlkj dk;Zokgh dj ;kphx.k ds thou o Lora=rk dks fdlh izdkj dh {kfr@gkfu dkfjr ugha gksuk lqfuf'pr djsaA

¶35

blh vuqlkj ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA

¶36

;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;g vkns'k ;kphx.k ds fo:) yfEcr ;k

¶37

izLrqr gksus okyh fdlh nhokuh@vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugha djsxk ,oa ,slh dk;Zokgh fof/k vuqlkj lEikfnr dh tk,xhA

¶38

VISHAL SHARMA /07

Gadul Devi D/O Shri Heeralal, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gadul Devi D/O Shri Heeralal, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Priya W/O Bhoop Singh D/O Vikram Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Vimla D/O Rambabu Vs State of Rajasthan

Javed Alias Zakir Son of Shree Zbrail Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Akanksha Kanawat W/O Omprakash Jindad, Vs State of Rajasthan

Aarti Sharma W/O Pankaj Kumar Meena, Vs State of Rajasthan

Abhishek S/O Yogesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan