Court directed the police to provide protection to the minor petitioners from their parents who were objecting to their marriage, citing Article 21 and Juvenile Justice Act.
Direction to police to provide protection to the petitioners from their parents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:18324]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 533/2025
----Petitioners
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. J S Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order
01/05/2025
;g fjV ;kfpdk ;kphx.k dh vksj ls v;kph la[;k 5 vkSj 6 dh vksj ls mUgsa tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk iSnk djus dh /kefd;ka feyus ds dkj.k v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 4 dks mUgsa lqj{kk iznku djus ds funsZ'k fn, tkus gsrq izLrqr dh gSA
[2025:RJ-JP:18324]
[CRLW-533/2025]
(2 of 3)
nksuksa i{kksa dks ;kfpdk ij lquk x;kA
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kphx.k dk rdZ gS fd ;kfpdkdkj o;Ld gSa rFkk ;kph la[;k&1 fiz;k dh tUe frfFk 10-07-2005 ,oa ;kph la[;k&2 Hkwi flag dh tUe frfFk 22-05-2002 gS] tks fd muds ek/;fed f'k{kk cksMZ] jktLFkku dh vadrkfydk dh izfr ls Li"Vr% izdV gks jgh gSA bl izdkj ls os nksuksa o;Ld gSa vkSj mUgksaus eafnj esa fookg dj fy;k gS] ftldk lgefr i= ifjf'k"V&2 gSA mudk rdZ gS fd ;kphx.k fookg ds ckn 'kkafriwoZd fuokl dj jgs gSa rFkk v;kph la[;k 4 o 5 tks ;kph la[;k&1 ds firk vkSj pkpk gSa] muds bl fookg ls [kq'k ugha gSa vkSj ;kphx.k dks tku ls ekjus dh /kefd;ka ns jgs gSaA mDr v;kphx.k ls ;kphx.k dks tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd mUgksaus U;k;ky; esa ;g ;kfpdk izLrqr djus ls iwoZ v;kph la[;k&3 vkSj 4 Øe'k% iqfyl v/kh{kd] ftyk&>qa>qauw vkSj Fkkuk izHkkjh cqgkuk] ftyk&>qa>qauw dks lqj{kk iznku djus gsrq i= iathd`r Mkd ls fHktok fn;k gS] tks ifjf'k"V&3 gSA vr% ;kphx.k dks v;kph la[;k&5 vkSj 6 ls iqfyl lqj{kk iznku dh tkosA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us fookfgr tksM+ksa dh lqj{kk ds lEcU/k esa U;kf;d fofu'p; izdk'k flag ,oa vU;&cuke&;wfu;u vkWQ bf.M;k esa funZs'k fn, gSa rFkk vuqPNsn 21 Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ,oa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d fofu'p; yrk flag&cuke&mRrj izns'k jkT; ,vkbZvkj 2006 ,llh 2522] ,l[kq'kcw&cuke&dUukbZEey 2010 ¼5½ ,llhlh 600] bUnzk ljek& cuke&ohdsoh ljek ¼2013½ 15 ,llhlh 755 rFkk 'kQhu tgku&cuke&vlksdu ds,e ,oa vU; ¼2018½ 16 ,llhlh 368 esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd, x, gSa fd izR;sd o;Ld O;fDr viuh bPNkuq:i jgus dks Lora= gSA fof/k }kjk LFkkfir izfØ;k ds vfrfjDr muds thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk dk guu djus dk fdlh dks vf/kdkj ugha gSA os dkuwu ds varxZr vius thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk ds izfr laj{k.k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSa] Hkys gh nks o;Ld O;fDr;ksa d s vkilh lEcU/k vlkekftd ekus tkosaA blds vfrfjDr jktLFkku
[2025:RJ-JP:18324]
[CRLW-533/2025]
(3 of 3)
iqfyl vf/kfu;e 2007 dh /kkjk 29 ds vuqlkj izR;sd iqfyl vf/kdkjh dk ;g drZO; gS fd og ukxfjdksa ds thou o O;fDrxr Lora=rk dh j{kk djsA
gLrxr izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjLFkfr;ksa esa ;kphx.k ds dFkuksa dh lnHkkfodrk o lR;rk ds laca/k esa dksbZ fVIi.kh o fu"d"kZ fn;s fcuk rFkk mDr fof/kd fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 4 dks ;g funsZ'k fn, tkrs gSa fd os ;kphx.k dh vksj ls v;kph la[;k&3 o 4 dks izsf"kr i= ifjf'k"V&3 dks fopkj (consider) esa yk,a o ;kphx.k dh dfFkr vlqj{kk ds laca/k esa vkdyu ds i'pkr vlqj{kk dk rRo ik;s tkus ij fu;ekuqlkj dk;Zokgh dj ;kphx.k ds thou o Lora=rk dks fdlh izdkj dh {kfr@gkfu dkfjr ugha gksuk lqfuf'pr djsaA
blh vuqlkj ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA
;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;g vkns'k ;kphx.k ds fo:) yfEcr ;k izLrqr gksus okyh fdlh nhokuh@vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugha djsxk ,oa ,slh dk;Zokgh fof/k vuqlkj lEikfnr dh tk,xhA
NIMIT GOYAL /20
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to liberty and protection from the parents?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Flag Cuke Mrj vs. State of RajasthanRelied on¶25
flag&cuke&mRrj izns'k jkT; ,vkbZvkj 2006 ,llh 2522
U&Cuke Sf;anu vs. AQ BfmDkaRelied on¶25
vU;&cuke&;wfu;u vkWQ bf.M;k
Yrk Flag Cuke Mrj vs. State of RajasthanRelied on¶25
yrk flag&cuke&mRrj izns'k jkT; ,vkbZvkj 2006 ,llh 2522
LK'Qkcw vs. DUnkbaeRelied on¶25
l[kq'kcw&cuke&dUukbZEey 2010 ¼5½ ,llhlh 600
Ljek vs. Ohdsoh LjekRelied on¶25
ljek& cuke&ohdsoh ljek ¼2013½ 15 ,llhlh 755
Qhu Tgku vs. Vlksdu D.E.Relied on¶25
'kQhu tgku&cuke&vlksdu ds,e ¼2018½ 16 ,llhlh 368
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Priya
Bhoop Singh
State Of Rajasthan
The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police
The Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu District
Station House Officer, Police Station Buhana
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
