Disposed

Tileswari Chahariya Deka D/O Shri Mati Ram Saharia, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 May 2025CRLW/354/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Inter-faith married couple sought police protection against threats to life and liberty from the wife's parents. The court directed the SP Jaipur Rural to consider the representation, assess the threat, and act per law without commenting on the truth of the claims.

What did the court decide?

Direction to SP Jaipur Rural to consider representation, assess threat, and ensure no harm to petitioners' life and liberty.

Tileswari Chahariya Deka D/O Shri… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:18800]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 354/2025

¶4

Tileswari Chahariya Deka D/o Shri Mati Ram Saharia, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Pakabangipara, Mangal Dai, Darrang, Assam, Presently Residing At Jhuntha Chuna, Tatala Ki Dhani, Loharwada, Kheri Milak, Kishangarh Rainwal, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶5

Lal Chand Yadav S/o Shri Ram Chandra Yadav, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Jhuntha Chuna, Tatala Ki Dhani, Loharwada, Kheri Milak, Kishangarh Rainwal, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶9

The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶10

The Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural.

¶11

The Sho, Police Station Mangal Dai, Assam.

¶12

The Sho, Police Station Jobner, District Jaipur. 6. Parinita Deka D/o Mukuta Deka, Residing At Pakabangipara, Mangal Dai, Darrang, Assam.

¶13

Surjya Sarkar S/o Mukut Deka, Residing At Pakabangipara, Mangal Dai, Darrang, Assam.

¶14

----Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.S.Rathore, PP

¶16

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order

¶17

05/05/2025

¶18

;g fjV ;kfpdk ;kphx.k dh vksj ls ftyk iqfyl v/kh{kd t;iqj xzkeh.k dks izsf"kr izfrosnu ifjf'k"V&4 esa nksuksa ;kphx.k us vkil esa fookg djuk ,oa mDr fookg ls ;kph la[;k&1 ds ekrk] firk ds [kq'k ugha gksus ls ;kphx.k dks tku ls ekjus dh /kedh fn, tkus ds dkj.k izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 yxk;r 5 dks mUgsa lqj{kk iznku djus ds funsZ'k fn, tkus gsrq izLrqr dh gSA

[2025:RJ-JP:18800]

[CRLW-354/2025]

(2 of 3)

nksuksa i{kksa dks ;kfpdk ij lquk x;kA

¶23

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kphx.k dk rdZ gS fd ;kfpdkdkj o;Ld gSa rFkk ;kph la[;k&1 frys'ojh dh tUe frfFk mlds iSu dkMZ ds vuqlkj 03-06-1995 ,oa ;kph la[;k&2 ykypan dh tUe frfFk 10-04-1991 gS tks fd mldh ek/;fed f'k{kk cksMZ jktLFkku dh vadrkfydk dh izfr ls Li"Vr% izdV gks jgh gSA bl izdkj ls os nksuksa o;Ld gSa] mUgksaus fookg dj fy;k gS tks ^^fookg iath;u vf/kdkjh xkft;kckn mRrj izns'k** esa iathd`r Hkh djok fy;k gS tks ifjf'k"V ^^3^^ ds :i esa layXu izek.k&i= ls izekf.kr gSA mudk rdZ gS fd ;kphx.k fookg ds ckn 'kkafriwoZd fuokl dj jgs gSa rFkk ;kph la[;k&1 ds ekrk] firk muds bl fookg ls [kq'k ugha gSa vkSj muls ;kphx.k dks tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd mUgksaus U;k;ky; esa ;g ;kfpdk izLrqr djus ls iwoZ iqfyl v/kh{kd t;iqj xzkeh.k dks ifjf'k"V&4 izLrqr dj fn;k gSA vr% ;kphx.k dks iqfyl lqj{kk iznku dh tkosA

¶24

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;kA mudh vksj ls lEcfU/kr Fkkukf/kdkjh dk tokc is'k dj ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd ifjokfn;k frys'ojh us ifjokn dh tkap ds nkSjku ;kphx.k dks fdlh ls dksbZ [krjk ugha gksuk crk;k gS] vr% ;g ;kfpdk fujLr dh tkosA

¶25

nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶26

i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd ;kph la[;k&1 }kjk izLrqr izfrosnu ifjf'k"V&4 dk izfrmRrj lEcfU/kr Fkkukf/kdkjh dh vksj ls is'k fd;k x;k gS] vr% mldk iqfyl lqj{kk gsrq izfrosnu fn;k tkuk izekf.kr gSA gkykafd fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dh vksj ls izLrqr Fkkukf/kdkjh ds mRrj esa ;kphx.k dh vksj ls fdlh izdkj dk tku dk [krjk ugha gksuk ,oa ifjokfn;k dh vksj ls dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkguk vafdr fd;k x;k gS ijUrq ;kphx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us vkt U;k;ky; esa izdV fd;k fd mUgsa vkt Hkh v;kph la[;k&6 o 7 ls tku o Lora=rk dk [krjk gSA muds i{kdkj us iqfyl Fkkus esa tks dFku fd, gSa os Lora=rkiwoZd fd, x, dFku ugha gSa] mUgsa lqj{kk iznku dh tk,A

[2025:RJ-JP:18800]

[CRLW-354/2025]

(3 of 3)

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us fookfgr tksM+ksa dh lqj{kk ds lEcU/k esa U;kf;d fofu'p; izdk'k flag ,oa vU;&cuke&;wfu;u vkWQ bf.M;k esa funZs'k fn, gSa rFkk vuqPNsn 21 Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ,oa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d fofu'p; yrk flag&cuke&mRrj izns'k jkT; ,vkbZvkj 2006 ,llh 2522] ,l[kq'kcw&cuke&dUukbZEey 2010 ¼5½ ,llhlh 600] bUnzk ljek& cuke&ohdsoh ljek ¼2013½ 15 ,llhlh 755 rFkk 'kQhu tgku&cuke&vlksdu ds,e ,oa vU; ¼2018½ 16 ,llhlh 368 esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd, x, gSa fd izR;sd o;Ld O;fDr viuh bPNkuq:i jgus dks Lora= gSA fof/k }kjk LFkkfir izfØ;k ds vfrfjDr muds thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk dk guu djus dk fdlh dks vf/kdkj ugha gSA os dkuwu ds varxZr vius thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk ds izfr laj{k.k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA blds vfrfjDr jktLFkku iqfyl vf/kfu;e 2007 dh /kkjk 29 ds vuqlkj izR;sd iqfyl vf/kdkjh dk ;g drZO; gS fd og ukxfjdksa ds thou o O;fDrxr Lora=rk dh j{kk djsA

¶31

gLrxr izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjLFkfr;ksa esa ;kphx.k ds dFkuksa dh lnHkkfodrk o lR;rk ds lEcU/k esa dksbZ Hkh fVIi.kh o fu"d"kZ fn, fcuk rFkk mDr fof/kd fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 5 dks ;g funsZ'k fn, tkrs gS a fd os ;kph la[;k&1 dh vksj ls v;kph la[;k&3 dks izsf"kr i= ifjf'k"V&4 dks fopkj (consider) esa yk,a o ;kphx.k dh dfFkr vlqj{kk ds lEcU/k esa vkdyu ds i'pkr vlqj{kk dk rRo ik, tkus ij fu;ekuqlkj dk;Zokgh dj ;kphx.k ds thou o Lora=rk dks fdlh izdkj dh {kfr@gkfu dkfjr ugha gksuk lqfuf'pr djsaA

¶32

blh vuqlkj ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA

¶33

;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;g vkns'k ;kphx.k ds fo:) yfEcr ;k izLrqr gksus okyh fdlh nhokuh@vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugha djsxk ,oa ,slh dk;Zokgh fof/k vuqlkj lEikfnr dh tk,xhA

¶34

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶35

AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /13

Tileswari Chahariya Deka D/O Shri Mati Ram Saharia, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tileswari Chahariya Deka D/O Shri Mati Ram Saharia, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akanksha Kanawat W/O Omprakash Jindad, Vs State of Rajasthan

Aarti Sharma W/O Pankaj Kumar Meena, Vs State of Rajasthan

Gadul Devi D/O Shri Heeralal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Sohani Devi Jyani Daughter of Shri Chhagan Lal, Wife of Shri Ramesh Chand Choudhary, Vs State of Rajasthan

Fija D/O Iliyas Khan, Vs State of Rajasthan

Salma Bano W/O Aabid Khan Vs State of Rajasthan