Partly allowed

Rinku Kumari W/O Bunty Bichar, D/O Rakesh Kumar, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Jul 2025CRLW/2138/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2138/2024 in an order dated 23/07/2025. The Court issued a notice to the Superintendent of Police (Respondent 1) and recalled the previous respondents to accommodate the warders of the warders to access and meet the warders as per the terms of the order and ensure the warders of the warders do not interfere with the warders.

What did the court decide?

Notice issued to respondent No.3 and recall of respondent Nos. 1, 4, 5, 7, 8 & 9 to secure warder rights without interference.

Rinku Kumari W/O Bunty Bichar, D/O… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:27473]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2138/2024

¶4

Rinku Kumari W/o Bunty Bichar, D/o Rakesh Kumar, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Shyampura, Dist. Sikar, (Raj.), At Present R/o Sewad Bari, District Sikar, (Raj.).

¶5

Banti Bhichar S/o Ram Kumar Bhichar, Aged About 21 Years, R/o R/o Sewad Bari, District Sikar, (Raj.).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶9

Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶10

The Superintendent Of Police, Sikar, Dist- Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶11

The Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Sikar, Dist. Sikar, (Raj.).

¶12

Rakesh Kumar S/o Ramkumar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Shyampura, Dist. Sikar, (Raj.).

¶13

Ranjeet S/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Dhod, Dist. Sikar, (Raj.).

¶14

Santosh S/o Balla Ram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Dhod, Dist. Sikar, (Raj.).

¶15

Madan S/o Balla Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Dhod, Dist. Sikar, (Raj.).

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Bochalya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP

¶18

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶19

Order

¶20

23/07/2025

¶21

dk;kZy; }kjk bafxr vk{ksi dze&2 ds laca/k esa lquk x;kA

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:27473]

[CRLW-2138/2024]

mDr vk{ksi ds laca/k esa ;kfpdk ds vuqPNsn dze&11 esa vadu fd;k tk pqdk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vk{ksi dze&2 nwj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶26

vk{ksi dze&1 ds laca/k esa lquk x;kA

¶27

i=koyh ds lkFk layXu ifjf'k"B&3 iqfyl v/kh{kd] lhdj dks izsf"kr izfrosnu gSA vr% mDr vk{ksi nwj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶28

;g fjV ;kfpdk ;kphx.k dh vksj ls v;kph la[;k 5 yxk;r 8 dh vksj ls mUgsa tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk iSnk djus dh /kefd;ka feyus ds dkj.k v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 4 dks mUgsa lqj{kk iznku djus ds funsZ'k fn, tkus gsrq izLrqr dh gSA

¶29

nksuksa i{kksa dks ;kfpdk ij lquk x;kA

¶30

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kphx.k dk rdZ gS fd ;kfpdkdkj o;Ld gSa rFkk ;kph la[;k&1 fjadw dqekjh dh tUe frfFk 09-01-2006 ,oa ;kph la[;k&2 caVh dh tUe frfFk 07-11-2003 gS] tks fd muds ek/;fed f'k{kk cksMZ dh vadrkfydk dh izfr ls Li"Vr% izdV gks jgh gSA bl izdkj ls os nksuksa o;Ld gSa vkSj mUgksaus fnukad 1811-2024 dks vk;Z lekt esa fookg dj fy;k gS] ftldk uxj fuxe xzsVj t;iqj }kjk tkjh fookg izek.ki= ifjf'k"V&2 gSA fookg dk iathdj.k fnukad 19-11-2024 dks djok;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd ;kphx.k fookg ds ckn 'kkafriwoZd fuokl dj jgs gSa rFkk v;kph la[;k 5 ls 8 tks ;kph la[;k&1 ds ifjokjtu gSa] muds bl fookg ls [kq'k ugha gSa vkSj /kefd;ka ns jgs gSaA mDr v;kphx.k ls ;kphx.k dks tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd mUgksaus U;k;ky; esa ;g ;kfpdk izLrqr djus ls iwoZ v;kph la[;k&3 dks lqj{kk iznku djus gsrq fHktok fn;k gS] tks ifjf'k"V&3 gSA vr% ;kphx.k dks iqfyl lqj{kk iznku dh tkosA

¶31

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶32

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us fookfgr tksM+ksa dh lqj{kk ds lEcU/k esa U;kf;d fofu'p; izdk'k flag ,oa vU;&cuke&;wfu;u vkWQ bf.M;k esa funZs'k fn, gSa rFkk vuqPNsn 21 Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ,oa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d fofu'p; yrk flag&cuke&mRrj izns'k jkT; ,vkbZvkj 2006 ,llh 2522] ,l-

[2025:RJ-JP:27473]

[CRLW-2138/2024]

(3 of 3)

[kq'kcw&cuke&dUukbZEey 2010 ¼5½ ,llhlh 600] bUnzk ljek& cuke&ohdsoh ljek ¼2013½ 15 ,llhlh 755 rFkk 'kQhu tgku&cuke&vlksdu ds,e ,oa vU; ¼2018½ 16 ,llhlh 368 esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd, x, gSa fd izR;sd o;Ld O;fDr viuh bPNkuq:i jgus dks Lora= gSA fof/k }kjk LFkkfir izfØ;k ds vfrfjDr muds thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk dk guu djus dk fdlh dks vf/kdkj ugha gSA os dkuwu ds varxZr vius thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk ds izfr laj{k.k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA blds vfrfjDr jktLFkku iqfyl vf/kfu;e 2007 dh /kkjk 29 ds vuqlkj izR;sd iqfyl vf/kdkjh dk ;g drZO; gS fd og ukxfjdksa ds thou o O;fDrxr Lora=rk dh j{kk djsA

¶37

gLrxr izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjLFkfr;ksa esa ;kphx.k ds dFkuksa dh lnHkkfodrk o lR;rk ds laca/k esa dksbZ fVIi.kh o fu"d"kZ fn;s fcuk rFkk mDr fof/kd fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 4 dks ;g funsZ'k fn, tkrs gSa fd os ;kphx.k dh vksj ls v;kph la[;k&3 dks izsf"kr i= ifjf'k"V&3 dks fopkj (consider) esa yk,a o ;kphx.k dh dfFkr vlqj{kk ds laca/k esa vkdyu ds i'pkr vlqj{kk dk rRo ik;s tkus ij fu;ekuqlkj dk;Zokgh dj ;kphx.k ds thou o Lora=rk dks fdlh izdkj dh {kfr@gkfu dkfjr ugha gksuk lqfuf'pr djsaA

¶38

rn~uqlkj ;kfpdk ,oa fofo/k izkFkZuki=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] rks fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA

¶39

;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;g vkns'k ;kphx.k ds fo:) yfEcr ;k izLrqr gksus okyh fdlh nhokuh@vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugha djsxk ,oa ,slh dk;Zokgh fof/k vuqlkj lEikfnr dh tk,xhA

¶40

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶41

VISHAL SHARMA /88

Rinku Kumari W/O Bunty Bichar, D/O Rakesh Kumar, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinku Kumari W/O Bunty Bichar, D/O Rakesh Kumar, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar S/O Shri Ramesh Chand Vs the State of Rajasthan

Anita Kumari Dhanka W/O Sonu Swami, D/O Madan Lal Dhanka, Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sushama D/O Shri Rajendra Prasad, Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahesh Sharma S/O Shri Ramesh Chandra Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangilal Vs State

Smt. Kavita Jat Daughter of Shri Ram Sahay Jat, Wife of Shri Surendra Singh Nitharwal, Vs State of Rajasthan