Allowed

Vijay Kumar S/O Shri Ramesh Chand v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Jul 2025CRLW/856/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court granted interim permanent parole to a serving life convict to complete his confinement period, ruling that the technical ground of not utilizing available parole slots is insufficient for refusal given his age and reform progress.

What did the court decide?

Interim permanent parole granted subject to reporting to Director General of Prisons within 15 days and surrendering certificates within 15 days.

Vijay Kumar S/O Shri Ramesh Chand Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:27304]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 856/2025

¶4

Vijay Kumar S/o Shri Ramesh Chand, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Lalawandi, Police Station Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present In Open Air Alwar).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Prisoners Parole Advisory Commitee (State Committee), Through Its Chairman, Director General Of Prisons, Rajasthan.

¶9

Superintendent Central Jail, Alwar.

¶10

The District Magistrate, Alwar.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP

¶13

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶14

Order

¶15

22/07/2025

¶16

;g fjV ;kfpdk ;kph@canh dh vksj ls LFkk;h ¼Permanent½ iSjksy ij fjgk ¼release½ fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk djrs gq, izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶17

cgl lquh xbZA ;kph&canh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd ;kph dks fopkj.k U;k;ky;] vij ftyk ,oa lS'ku U;k;k/kh'k] la[;k&01] vyoj }kjk vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 304 Hkkx I ,oa 341 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa nks"kfl) fd;k tkdj 07 o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS rFkk orZeku esa og vfHkj{kk gSA mudk rdZ jgk fd ;kph dh vksj ls LFkk;h iSjksy gsrq tsy v/kh{kd] dsUnzh; dkjkx`g] vyoj ds le{k izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk] tks fnukad 30-05-2025 dks bl vk/kkj ij fujLr dj fn;k x;k fd ;kph }kjk rhu fu;fer iSjksy dk miHkksx ugha fd;k x;k gS] tks iSjksy ds fu;eksa esa vko';d gSA mudk rdZ gS fd ;kph us

[2025:RJ-JP:27304]

[CRLW-856/2025]

(2 of 4)

lkr o"kZ dh ltk ds ,ot esa yxHkx 05 o"kZ 06 ekg dh ltk Hkqxr yh gSA bl izdkj ;kph] mls fn;s x;s dkjkokl dh vof/k esa ls 2@3 vof/k vfHkj{kk esa O;rhr dj pqdk gS vkSj ltk Hkqxrus dh n`f"V ls og iSjksy fu;eksa ds vUrxZr LFkkbZ iSjksy dk ik= gks pqdk gSA vr% dsoy iwoZ esa rhu fu;fer iSjksy dk ykHk ugha fy;s tkus tSls rduhdh vk/kkj ij mls LFkk;h iSjksy fn;s tkus ls budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA mlds fo#) iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr ugha gSA tsy izkf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk izLrqr fjiksVZ esa ;kph dk vkpj.k larks"kizn gksuk vafdr fd;k x;k gSA vr% LFkkbZ iSjksy dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fo}ku vf/koDrk us fuEu U;kf;d fu.kZ; izLrqr fd;s gSa&

¶22

1- Suresh & others Vs. State of Rajasthan, 2011 (3) WLC 643

¶23

Suraj Giri Vs. State of Rajasthan & others, 2011 Criminal Law

¶24

Journal-1534

¶25

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us bu rdksZa dk fojks/k fd;k vkSj izdV fd;k fd jktLFkku canh dkjkodk'k ij fjgk fu;e 2021 ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr LFkk;h iSjksy dk ykHk fn;s tkus ls iwoZ canh }kjk rhu fu;fer iSjksy dk miHkksx fd;s tkus vkSj nh xbZ dqy ltk vof/k esa ls 2@3 vof/k dh ltk Hkqxr fy;s tkus dh 'krsZa iw.kZ djuk vko';d gSA orZeku ekeys esa ;kph us rhu fu;fer iSjksy dk miHkksx ugha fd;k gS vkSj blh vk/kkj ij lacaf/kr izkf/kdkjh }kjk mldk izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k x;k gS] ftlesa dksbZ =qfV ugha gSA vr% ;kfpdk fujLr dh tkosA

¶26

geus izLrqr rdZ&fordZ ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶27

;kph dks fopkj.k U;k;ky;] vij ftyk ,oa lS'ku U;k;k/kh'k] la[;k&01] vyoj }kjk vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 304 Hkkx I ,oa /kkjk 341 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa nks"kfl) fd;k tkdj 07 o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] mlesa ls ;kph yxHkx 5 o"kZ vkSj 6 ekg dh vof/k dkjkokl esa O;rhr dj pqdk gS] bl izdkj ;kph us mls nh xbZ dqy ltk esa ls 2@3 vof/k dh ltk iw.kZ dj yh gSA

¶28

tgkWa rd canh }kjk fu;fer rhu iSjksy dk miHkksx ugha fd;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij lacaf/kr izkf/kdkjh }kjk mldk LFkk;h iSjksy dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr djus

[2025:RJ-JP:27304]

[CRLW-856/2025]

(3 of 4)

dk iz'u gS] bl laca/k esa fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d fu.kZ; Suresh & others Vs. State of Rajasthan, reported in 2011 (3) WLC 643 , dk fuEu vfHker egRoiw.kZ o lqlaxr gS %

¶33

Division Bench of this Court had held that on the technical ground that the petitioner has not availed three permanent paroles is not a good ground to deny the parole until some adverse material is brought on record that if the petitioner is released on parole, the same with cause disturbance in the society.

¶34

blh izdkj U;kf;d fu.kZ; Suraj Giri Vs. State of Rajasthan & others, reported in 2011 Criminal Law Journal-1534 , esa ;g fu.khZr fd;k x;k gS fd %

¶35

It has been observed by the Court that non-availing of three or any of paroles by the prisoner itself is not a sound ground for refusal of permanent parole.

¶36

bl izdkj mDr U;kf;d fu.kZ;ksa esa ;g Li"V vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd rhu fu;fer iSjksy dk miHkksx ugha fd;k tkuk ,d rduhdh vk/kkj gS vkSj bls LFkkbZ iSjksy ls budkjh dk etcwr vk/kkj ugha ekuk tk ldrk gSA

¶37

orZeku ekeys esa ;g fookfnr ugha gS fd ;kph }kjk izFke fu;fer iSjksy 20 fnol dk miHkksx fd;k tkdj le; ij dkjkxg esa leiZ.k fd;k x;k gS vkSj izFke iSjksy dh 'krksZa dk mYya?ku ugha fd;k x;k gSA tsy izkf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk izLrqr fjiksVZ esa vfHkj{kk dh vof/k ds nkSjku ;kph dk vkpj.k larks"kizn gksuk vafdr fd;k x;k gSA iSjksy dk ykHk fn;s tkus ds laca/k esa lacaf/kr dkjkxg dh dksbZ izfrdwy fVIi.kh@fjiksVZ Hkh ugha gSA

¶38

mi;qZDr foospu ,oa izLrqr U;kf;d fu.kZ;ksa dh jks'kuh esa ;kph&canh dks LFkkbZ iSjksy dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶39

ifj.kker% ;g iSjksy fjV ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa dk;kZy; v/kh{kd] dsUnzh; dkjkx`g] vyoj }kjk ;kph&canh dk LFkkbZ iSjksy dk izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj djus dk vkns'k fnukafdr 30-05-2025 fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA vkns'k fn;k

[2025:RJ-JP:27304]

[CRLW-856/2025]

(4 of 4)

tkrk gS fd ;kph&canh ;fn nks lIrkg dh vof/k esa lacaf/kr ftyk eftLVªsV ds le{k ,d yk[k :i;s dk futh ca/ki= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa bu 'krksZa ds lkFk izLrqr djs fd og nkSjkus LFkk;h iSjksy ¼Permanent parole½ fdlh izdkj dh vokaNuh; ,oa vkijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk] iSjksy dh vof/k esa 'kkafr o lkSgknZ cuk;s j[ksxk ,oa lacaf/kr eftLVªsV }kjk vf/kjksfir 'krksZa dh iw.kZr% ikyuk djsxk rks mls LFkkbZ iSjksy ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶44

iSjksy dh vof/k ds nkSjku ;kph&canh dk fdlh izdkj dh vokaNuh; xfrfof/k esa fyIr ik;s tkus vFkok vf/kjksfir 'krksZa dk mYya?ku fd;s tkus dh fLFkfr esa mls cdk;k ltk Hkqxrus ds fy;s cqyk;k tk ldsxkA

¶45

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶46

NIMIT GOYAL /62

Vijay Kumar S/O Shri Ramesh Chand v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar S/O Shri Ramesh Chand v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lucky Singh S/O Shri Manoj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Bashir Khan S/O Rama Vs State of Rajasthan

Hazarilal S/O Pannalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Anita Kumari Dhanka W/O Sonu Swami, D/O Madan Lal Dhanka, Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sushama D/O Shri Rajendra Prasad, Vs State of Rajasthan

Suman W/O Basant, Vs State of Rajasthan