Disposed

Anisha W/O Digambar Singh, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 May 2025CRLW/190/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A married adult couple sought protection from threats by the wife's family. Relying on Supreme Court precedents affirming the right of adults to live together under Article 21 and Rule 29 of the Rajasthan Police Rules, the court directed respondents 1-4 to consider the representation and act according to law if a threat was found.

What did the court decide?

Directions to official respondents to consider the representation and take lawful action to protect the petitioners' life and liberty if insecurity is found.

Anisha W/O Digambar Singh, Vs State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:20378]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 190/2025

¶4

Anisha W/o Digambar Singh, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Mahadev Ke Pass, Mohalla Gopalgarh, Bharatpur, Presently Resident Of Near Shed Ka Mad, Mohalla Gopalgarh, Bharatpur (Raj). Aadhar Card No. 5007-4189-0332.

¶5

Digambar Singh Son Of Shri Sardar Singh, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Malhu, Mathura ( U.p)., Of Presently Resident Of Near Shed Ka Mad, Mohalla Gopalgarh, Bharatpur (Raj). Aadhar No. 5738-4938-3721.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶9

The Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur.

¶10

The Nodal Officer, Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur.

¶11

Sho Police Station Mathuragate, District Bharatpur. 5. Raju Verma Son Of Ramesh Chand, Resident Of Mahadev Ke Pass, Mohalla Gopalgarh, Bharatpur.

¶12

Aasha Verma Raju Verma, Resident Of Mahadev Ke Pass, Mohalla Gopalgarh, Bharatpur.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP

¶15

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶16

Order

¶17

14/05/2025

¶18

dk;kZy; vkifRr la[;k&1 o 2 nwj djus ds lEcU/k esa ;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dks lquk x;kA fjV ;kfpdk ds vk/kkjksa esa vk{ksi la[;k&2 ds lEcU/k esa vfHkdFku gksus rFkk iqfyl v/kh{kd dks Hksts x, izfrosnu dh izfr rFkk Mkd

[2025:RJ-JP:20378]

[CRLW-190/2025]

(2 of 3)

jlhn@izfr layXu gksus ds dkj.k dk;kZy; }kjk bafxr nksuksa vk{ksi nwj fd, tkus dk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gSA

¶23

;g fjV ;kfpdk ;kphx.k dh vksj ls izR;FkhZ la[;k 5 yxk;r 6 dh vksj ls mUgsa tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk iSnk djus dh /kefd;ka feyus ds dkj.k izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 yxk;r 4 dks mUgsa lqj{kk iznku djus ds funsZ'k fn, tkus gsrq izLrqr dh gSA

¶24

nksuksa i{kksa dks ;kfpdk ij lquk x;kA

¶25

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kphx.k dk rdZ gS fd ;kfpdkdkj o;Ld gSa rFkk ;kph la[;k&1 vfu'kk dh tUe frfFk 12-01-2003 ,oa ;kph la[;k&2 fnxEcj flag dh tUe frfFk 10-12-2001 gS tks fd mudh ek/;fed@dsUnzh; ek/;fed f'k{kk cksMZ dh vadrkfydkvksa dh izfr;ksa ls Li"Vr% izdV gks jgh gSA bl izdkj ls os nksuksa o;Ld gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd ;kphx.k us Hkjriqj esa fookg dj fy;k gS tks ^^fookg iath;u vf/kdkjh eFkqjk ds dk;kZy;** esa iathdr Hkh djok fy;k gS tks ifjf'k"V&2 ds :i esa layXu izek.k&i= ls izekf.kr gSA mudk rdZ gS fd ;kphx.k fookg ds ckn 'kkafriwoZd fuokl dj jgs gSa rFkk v;kph la[;k&5 yxk;r 6 muds bl fookg ls [kq'k ugha gSa vkSj muls ;kphx.k dks tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd mUgksaus U;k;ky; esa ;g ;kfpdk izLrqr djus ls iwoZ iqfyl v/kh{kd dks ,d izfrosnu ifjf'k"V&3 iathdr Mkd ls fHktok fn;k gSA ijarq muds }kjk dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh xbZ gS] vr% ;kphx.k dks iqfyl lqj{kk iznku dh tkosA

¶26

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶27

ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us fookfgr tksM+ksa dh lqj{kk ds lEcU/k esa U;kf;d fofu'p; izdk'k flag ,oa vU;&cuke&;wfu;u vkWQ bf.M;k esa funZs'k fn, gSa rFkk vuqPNsn 21 Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ,oa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d fofu'p; yrk flag&cuke&mRrj izns'k jkT; ,vkbZvkj 2006 ,llh 2522] ,l[kq'kcw&cuke&dUukbZEey 2010 ¼5½ ,llhlh 600] bUnzk ljek& cuke&ohdsoh ljek ¼2013½ 15 ,llhlh 755 rFkk 'kQhu tgku&cuke&vlksdu ds,e ,oa vU; ¼2018½ 16 ,llhlh 368 esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd, x, gSa fd izR;sd o;Ld O;fDr

[2025:RJ-JP:20378]

[CRLW-190/2025]

(3 of 3)

viuh bPNkuq:i jgus dks Lora= gSA fof/k }kjk LFkkfir izfØ;k ds vfrfjDr muds thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk dk guu djus dk fdlh dks vf/kdkj ugha gSA os dkuwu ds varxZr vius thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk ds izfr laj{k.k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA blds vfrfjDr jktLFkku iqfyl vf/kfu;e 2007 dh /kkjk 29 ds vuqlkj izR;sd iqfyl vf/kdkjh dk ;g drZO; gS fd og ukxfjdksa ds thou o O;fDrxr Lora=rk dh j{kk djsA

¶32

gLrxr izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjLFkfr;ksa esa ;kphx.k ds dFkuksa dh lnHkkfodrk o lR;rk ds lEcU/k esa dksbZ Hkh fVIi.kh o fu"d"kZ fn, fcuk rFkk mDr fof/kd fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 4 dks ;g funsZ'k fn, tkrs gS a fd os ;kphx.k dh vksj ls izsf"kr i= ifjf'k"V&3 dks fopkj (consider) esa yk,a o ;kphx.k dh dfFkr vlqj{kk ds lEcU/k esa vkdyu ds i'pkr vlqj{kk dk rRo ik, tkus ij fu;ekuqlkj dk;Zokgh dj ;kphx.k ds thou o Lora=rk dks fdlh izdkj dh {kfr@gkfu dkfjr ugha gksuk lqfuf'pr djsaA

¶33

blh vuqlkj ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA LFkxu ,oa vU; dksbZ izkFkZuk&i= ;fn dksbZ gks] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA

¶34

;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;g vkns'k ;kphx.k ds fo:) yfEcr ;k izLrqr gksus okyh fdlh nhokuh@vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugha djsxk ,oa ,slh dk;Zokgh fof/k vuqlkj lEikfnr dh tk,xhA

¶35

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶36

AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /92

Anisha W/O Digambar Singh, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anisha W/O Digambar Singh, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Komal Saini D/O Shri Satayendra Kumar Saini, Vs State of Rajasthan

Shiv Devi W/O Hoshiyar Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Akshita Jangid D/O Ramprasad Jangid Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamli Devi Wife of Ramakaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Lokesh Meena S/O Shree Ramphool Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Sukina D/O Sh. Kale Khan W/O Akramdeen Vs State of Rajasthan