Bail application by two petitioners seeking release; petitioners' counsel stated they wished to withdraw the application, and the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the bail application, along with any pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:20238]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Tantia For Respondent(s) : Mr. J S Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
14/05/2025
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k us izdV fd;k fd os bl izkFkZuki= dks okfil ysuk pkgrs gSaA izkFkhZx.k vf/koDrk ds mDr dFkuksa dks fjdkWMZ ij fy;k tkrk gSA
izkFkhZx.k dks ;g tekur izkFkZuki= okfil fy, tkus dh vuqefr iznku dh tkrh gS rFkk bl vk/kkj ij tekur izkFkZuki= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA rn~uqlkj fofo/k izkFkZuki=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] rks fujLr fd;s tkrs gSaA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
VISHAL SHARMA /54
1 issue framed by the court
The petitioners sought withdrawal of the bail application; was it to be dismissed as withdrawn?
Kamli Devi
Tarachand
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
