Revision petition against conviction and fine under Section 138 NI Act after appellate court upheld trial court's decision. Parties reached a written compromise, amount paid to complainant; court allowed petition, quashed both orders and acquitted the accused of the Section 138 charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:21836]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 828/2025
Narendra Kumar Sewani S/o Raj Kumar Sewani, Aged About 41 Years, C/o Govind Book Company Shop No 172 Opposite Tadkeshwar Ji Temple Chaura Rasta Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arpit Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Manas Baloda, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
23/05/2025
fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; fof'k"V U;kf;d eftLVªsV ¼,u-vkbZ- ,DV izdj.k½] Øe&4] t;iqj egkuxj izFke }kjk vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k &78@2020 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 03-08-2024] ftlds rgr v;kph@ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ifjokn ij ;kph@vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e esa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, ,d o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ,oa 4]70]000@& :i;s dk vFkZn.M@izfrdj vf/kjksfir dj nf.Mr fd;k x;k] vne vnk;xh@izfrdj vFkZn.M rhu ekg ds vfrfjDr lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k] ftlds fo:) izLrqr nkf.Md vihy la[;k &28@2024 v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky;] fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k ¼tkyh uksV izdj.k½] t;iqj egkuxj izFke }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 04-04-2025 ls [kkfjt dh xbZ] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
[2025:RJ-JP:21836]
[CRLR-828/2025]
(2 of 2)
cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph dk dFku jgk fd i{kksa ds e/; jkthukek gks pqdk gS rFkk ifjoknh dks ;kph }kjk jkthukek vuqlkj jkf'k vnk dj nh xbZ gS ,oa bl dze esa fyf[kr esa le>kSrk i=@jkthukek i=koyh ij izLrqr gSA mDr le>kSrk i=@jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k us i{kksa ds e/; jkthukek LosPN;k ls gksuk crk;k gS] le>kSrk i=@jkthukek i=koyh ij miyC/k gS rFkk jftLVªkj U;kf;d }kjk mls rLnhd fd;k x;k gS] vijk/k 'keuh; gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa mijksDr jkthukes ds vk/kkj ij ;kph@vfHk;qDRk dks /kkjk 138 ,u-vkbZ-,DV ds vijk/k ls nks"keqDr fd;k tkuk lehphu gSA
ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ,oa fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; Øe'k% fnukafdr 03-08-2024 ,oa 04-04-2025 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vkjksi ls tfj, jkthukek nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gSA
vU; dksbZ vkosnu ;fn yafcr gks] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /87
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision petition should be allowed on the basis of a written compromise between complainant and accused in a cheque dishonour case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narendra Kumar Sewani
The State Of Rajasthan
Vikram Singh
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
