Dismissed

Imammuddin Son of Nasru (Bhusawaria) v. Haneef Urf Hallo Son of Yasin

Rajasthan HC22 May 2025CRLR/751/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Crl. Re. Petition, the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petition filed by a 64-year-old petitioner seeking revival of a stale maintained FIR under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court relied on SC precedents to hold that while Section 148 allows deposit orders, the specific circumstances did not warrant intervention to quash the dismissal of the revision petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; order to deposit ₹10,000 within 30 days.

Imammuddin Son of Nasru (Bhusawaria) Vs Haneef Urf Hallo… — Cheque Dishonour | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:21666]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 751/2025

¶4

Imammuddin Son Of Nasru (Bhusawaria), Aged About 64 Years, Resident Of Basanta Member Wali Gali Dhol Tase Wale Hindaun City District Karauli (Raj)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Haneef Urf Hallo Son Of Yasin, Aged About 596 Years, Resident Of Near Chopar Kua Tulsipura Shahganj Hindaun City District Karauli

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Amir Aziz, Adv.
For	: Mr. Rajendra Prasad Gautam,
Respondent(s)	Adv.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

Judgment / Order

REPORTABLE

22/05/2025

;kph@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k dze&2] fg.MkSu flVh ¼djkSyh½ }kjk vkijkf/kd vihy la[;k 39@2025 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 03-04-2025 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS ftlds ek/;e ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDr dks nks"kfl) fd;s tkus ds i'pkr vihy ds nkSjku n.Mkns'k LFkfxr djrs le; fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; us vU; 'krksZa ds lkFk izfrdj dh jkf'k dk 20 izfr'kr nks ekg esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k tek djokus dk vkns'k fn;kA

[CRLR-751/2025]

[2025:RJ-JP:21666]

(2 of 5)

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph }kjk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; Jamboo Bhandari Vs. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 776 rFkk bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk ,dyihB nkafMd fuxjkuh ;kfpdk la[;k 1747@2023 lksgu yky 'kekZ cuke es?kpan esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 24-11-2023 dh izfr izLrqr djrs gq, ;g rdZ fn;k fd ;kph@vfHk;qDr 62 o"khZ; o`) O;fDr gS] dbZ chekfj;ksa ls xzflr gS rFkk vkfFkZd fLFkfr Hkh lgh ugha gS] vr% bu viokfnd ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa vk{ksfir vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk izfrdj jkf'k dh 20 izfr'kr jkf'k tek djokus dh 'krZ vf/kjksfir dh x;h gS] og vuqfpr o ihMknk;d gS rFkk vfHk;qDr ds vihy djus ds fof/kd vf/kdkjksa dks foijhr :i ls izHkkfor dj jgh gS] vr% vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶19

blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh }kjk vk{ksfir vkns'k dks fof/k&lEer gksuk crkrs gq, ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶20

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds laca/k esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶21

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d fu.kZ; Stanny Felix Pinto Vs. Jangid Builders Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (2001) 2 SCC 416 ds ekeys esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd tgka /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ¼vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e^^ dgk tkosxk½ ds vijk/k eas nks"kfl) fd;k x;k gks] rks n.Mkns'k LFkfxr djrs le; ,d ;qfDr;qDr jkf'k vnk fd;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k tkuk

[CRLR-751/2025]

[2025:RJ-JP:21666]

(3 of 5)

lehphu gksxk vkSj ;g jkf'k lkekU; :i ls 25&50 izfr'kr gks ldrh gSA mijksDr fu.kZ; ds le; ^^vf/kfu;e^^ dh /kkjk&148 ds izko/kku izHkko esa ugha FksA ;g izko/kku la'kks/ku ds ek/;e ls tksM+rs gq, fnukad 01-09-2018 ls izHkkoh fd;s x;s gSa tks fuEukuqlkj gS&

¶26

"148. Power of Appellate Court to order payment pending appeal against conviction .—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), in an appeal by the drawer against conviction under section 138, the Appellate Court may order the appellant to deposit such sum which shall be a minimum of twenty per cent. of the fine or compensation awarded by the trial Court:

¶27

Provided that the amount payable under this sub-section shall be in addition to any interim compensation paid by the appellant under section 143A. ........"

¶28

U;kf;d n`"VkUr lksguyky 'kekZ ¼iwoksZDr½ ds ekeys esa led{k ihB }kjk vf/kjksfir 20 izfr'kr jkf'k tek djokus gsrq le;kof/k dk foLrkj fd;k gS] dksbZ vafre vkns'k ikfjr ugha fd;k gSA U;kf;d fu.kZ; Jamboo Bhandari ¼iwoksZDr½ ds ekeys eas ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk lqlaxr izko/kkuksa dks fopkj esa ysus ds mijkUr ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd ^^vf/kfu;e^^ dh /kkjk&148 esa U;wure 20 izfr'kr jkf'k tek djokus dk izko/kku gS] og ,ClY;wV ugha gS rFkk fof'k"V viokfnd ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa bl jkf'k ds laca/k esa f'kfFkyrk iznku dh tk ldrh gSA U;kf;d fu.kZ; Stanny Felix Pinto ¼iwoksZDr½ o ^^vf/kfu;e^^ dh /kkjk 148 ds izko/kkuksa dks ns[krs gq, U;wure 20 izfr'kr jkf'k tek

[CRLR-751/2025]

[2025:RJ-JP:21666]

(4 of 5)

djokus dk lkekU; fu;e gS] ;g izko/kku vkKkid ugha gS] rc Hkh de ls de funsZ'kkRed gS rFkk tc rd dksbZ Hkh viokfnd fojyre ifjfLFkfr u gks] rc rd lekkU; :i ls vxj f'kfFkyrk iznku dh tkrh jgh rks mijksDr izko/kku dks la'kks/ku ds ek/;e ls tksM+s tkus dk iz;kstu gh lekIr gks tk;sxkA

¶33

orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr i{k dh vksj ls ;g crk;k x;k gS fd og 64 o"kZ dk o) O;fDr gS rFkk vLoLFk gS vkSj mldh foijhr vkfFkZd fLFkfr gS] ;g dkj.k ,d lkekU; dkj.k gS rFkk ,sls cpko fdlh Hkh vfHk;qDr }kjk fy;s tk ldrs gSaA 64 o"kZ dh vk;q vR;f/kd o)koLFkk gks] ,slh fLFkfr ugha gSA izLrqr fpfdRlh; nLrkostksa ls ;kph@vfHk;qDr xaHkhj chekfj;ksa ls xzflr gks] ,slh Hkh fLFkfr ugha gSA vkfFkZd fLFkfr ds laca/k esa Hkh dksbZ nLrkost vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ugha fd;s x;s gSaA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd mlus edku cukus gsrq ifjoknh ls _.k izkIr fd;k Fkk rFkk izkseksljh uksV fu"ikfnr fd;kA

¶34

nks"kfl)h ds mijkUr ,sls lkekU; o gYds cpkoksa ds vk/kkj ij mijksDr izko/kku ls f'kfFkyrk iznku djrs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k esa gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk drbZ mfpr ugha gSA vk{ksfir vkns'k iw.kZr% rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gS rFkk ek= foyEc dkfjr djus ds fy, vkSj izfrdj vnk;xh ls cpus ds fy, fcuk fdlh mfpr vk/kkj ds ;g ;kfpdk izLrqr dj U;k;ky; dh dk;Zokgh dks foyfEcr djus dk iz;kl fd;k x;k gS rFkk v;kph@ifjoknh dks vuko';d :i ls mPp U;k;ky; esa viuk i{k j[kus gsrq vf/koDrk fu;qDr djuk iM+k gSA

¶35

[2025:RJ-JP:21666]

¶36

vr% lEiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k iq"V djrs gq, ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk 10]000@& :i;s dksLV [kkfjt dh tkrh gS] LFkxu vkosnu Hkh mijksDrkuqlkj vLohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶37

10]000@& :i;s dh dksLV jkf'k vkt ls 30 fnu esa ;kph@vfHk;qDr }kjk v;kph@ifjoknh ds uke ls Mh-Mh- cuokrs gq, fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa tek djokrs gq, vnk dh tkos] vikyu gksus ij v;kph@ifjoknh bl U;k;ky; ds le{k voekuuk dk;Zokgh djus gsrq Lora= gksxkA

¶38

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶39

Mittal /67

Imammuddin Son of Nasru (Bhusawaria) v. Haneef Urf Hallo Son of Yasin

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Imammuddin Son of Nasru (Bhusawaria) v. Haneef Urf Hallo Son of Yasin

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Kumar Vs State

Hanuman Sahai Son of Shri Kalyan Sahai Vs State of Rajasthan

Indraj S/O Prem Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rattaram and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Pappusingh S/O Biram Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Nageshwar Soni Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp.