Revision against conviction and appellate dismissal in a Section 138 NI Act cheque dishonour case. The parties informed the court that they had compromised the dispute and the compromise was verified by the registry. The revision was allowed and both courts' judgments were set aside, acquitting the accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:7001]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 249/2025
Smt. Sohani W/o Late Shri Ratan Lal Ji, Aged About 58 Years, Fourth Class Employee Forest Department Jaipur Road Ajmer
----Petitioner
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harish Agrawal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Nemi Chand Sharma
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
17/02/2025
fopkj.k U;k;ky; fof'k"B U;kf;d eftLVªsV ¼,u vkbZ ,DV izdj.k½ la[;k&02] vtesj }kjk fu;fer QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k&391@2019 ¼141@19½ esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 10-11-2022] ftlds rgr v;kph&ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ifjokn ij ;kph&vfHk;qDrk dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e esa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, Ng ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ,oa 1]00]000@& :i;s crkSj izfrdj vf/kjksfir dj nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) vfHk;qDrk dh vksj ls izLrqr nkf.Md vihy la[;k&137@2022 fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k la[;k&03] vtesj ¼jkt0½ }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 29-08-2024 ls vihy fujLr dh xbZ] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph&vfHk;qDrk dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
vkt mifLFkr nksuksa i{kdkjksa }kjk izdV fd;k x;k fd muds e/; bl ekeys esa vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e esa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA ifjoknh vc fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ dk;Zokgh vfHk;qDrk ds fo:) pykuk ugha
[2025:RJ-JP:7001]
[CRLR-249/2025]
(2 of 2)
pkgrk gSA ewy jkthukek i=koyh ij miyC/k gS rFkk bl U;k;ky; ds vkt gh ds vkns'k dh ikyuk esa vknsf'kr dkWLV dh jkf'k tek djk;s tkus ds i'pkr~ jftLVªkj ¼U;kf;d½ }kjk jkthukek lR;kfir fd;k tk pqdk gSA vr% bl iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gSa rFkk fopkj.k U;k;ky; o vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; dze'k% fnukafdr 10-11-2022 rFkk 29-08-2024 vikLr fd, tkrs gS rFkk ;kph&vfHk;qDrk dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vkjksi ls jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gSA lkFk gh ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= o vU; izkFkZuk i=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
NIMIT GOYAL /164
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision could be disposed of as compromise between the parties in a Section 138 NI Act matter.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Sohani W/o Late Shri Ratan Lal Ji
Mayank Mishra
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
