Allowed¶23

Mukesh Vishnoi S/O Shri Rajesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Feb 2025CRLMA/323/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRLMA 323/2024 in Bail Appln. 7906/2024; Rajasthan HC Jaipur; decided 14-02-2025; Shubha Mehta (J.); application under S.528 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita to modify bail order dated 10-07-2024; monthly attendance on the 10th moved from PS Clock Tower, District Ajmer to PS Lohawat, District Falodi; petitioners Mukesh Vishnoi and Mukesh Kumar Vishnoi; State represented by PP Manju Dave; petition allowed.

What did the court decide?

Petition accepted; order dated 10-07-2024 modified — petitioners/accused to mark attendance on the 10th of each month at Police Station Lohawat, District Falodi in place of Police Station Clock Tower, District Ajmer. ¶23

Mukesh Vishnoi S/O Shri Rajesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶23

Issue for consideration

Whether the application under Section 528, Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking recall/modification of the release (bail) order dated 10-07-2024 should be accepted, so that the petitioners may mark their monthly attendance at Police Station Lohawat, District Falodi in place of Police Station Clock Tower, District Ajmer.

¶21

Court's answer

Having heard arguments and considered all the facts and circumstances, the petition is accepted and the order dated 10-07-2024 issued by this Court is modified.

¶23

Ratio / Principle

The petitioners/accused are directed to mark their attendance on the 10th of every month at Police Station Lohawat, District Falodi in place of Police Station Clock Tower, District Ajmer.

¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail-condition modification — High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, 14.02.2025 (Shubha Mehta, J.): S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 323/2024 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7906/2024, filed under Section 528, Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita by two accused (Mukesh Vishnoi and Mukesh Kumar Vishnoi, confined in Central Jail, Ajmer) seeking recall/modification of this Court's release (bail) order dated 10-07-2024, which had directed them to mark attendance at the concerned police station on the 10th of every month until conclusion of the case. Being residents of Police Station Lohawat, District Falodi, they were required to attend Police Station Clock Tower, District Ajmer every month, consuming considerable time; the Learned Public Prosecutor opposed. The Court, having considered all facts and circumstances, accepted the petition and modified the order dated 10-07-2024: attendance is now to be marked on the 10th of each month at Police Station Lohawat, District Falodi in place of Police Station Clock Tower, District Ajmer.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:6629]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 323/2024

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7906/2024

¶6

Mukesh Vishnoi S/o Shri Rajesh Kumar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Hanuman Nagar, Bhojakor, Police Station Lohawat, District Falod, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer, District Ajmer).

¶7

Mukesh Kumar Vishnoi S/o Shri Arjunram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Vishnoiyo Ki Dhaniya, Dhelana, Police Station Lohawat, District Falodi, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer, District Ajmer).

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶11

----Respondent

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anushree Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP

¶13

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶14

Order

¶15

14/02/2025

¶16

izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls ;g izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 528 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk izLrqr dj] bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 10-07-2024 dks ikfjr tekur vkns'k dks Recall / Modification fd, tkus gsrq izLrqr fd;k gSA

¶17

mudk fuosnu gS fd vkns'k fnukad 10-07-2024 ds }kjk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj ;g funsZ'k fn;k x;k Fkk fd os izdj.k ds fopkj.k rd lacaf/kr iqfyl Fkkuk esa izR;sd ekg dh 10 rkjh[k dks viuh mifLFkfr ntZ djk,axsA mudk fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k iqfyl Fkkuk yksgkoV] ftyk Qyksnh ds fuoklh gSa rFkk ekeys esa mUgsa gj ekg iqfyl Fkkuk DykWd VkWoj] ftyk vtesj esa mifLFkfr nsus gsrq vkuk gksrk gS] ftlesa dkQh

[2025:RJ-JP:6629]

[CRLMA-323/2024]

(2 of 2)

le; yxrk gSA mudk fuosnu gS fd U;k;fgr esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks iqfyl Fkkuk DykWd VkWoj] ftyk vtesj ds LFkku ij iqfyl Fkkuk yksgkoV] ftyk Qyksnh esa mifLFkfr nsus gsrq funsZ'k fn;k tk,A

¶22

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us fojks/k izdV fd;k A

¶23

lquk x;kA fopkj fd;k x;kA leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk bl U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 10-07-2024 dks la'kksf/kr djrs gq, izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks iqfyl Fkkuk DykWd VkWoj] ftyk vtesj ds LFkku ij iqfyl Fkkuk yksgkoV] ftyk Qyksnh esa izR;sd ekg dh 10 rkjh[k dks mifLFkfr ntZ djkus dk funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gSA A

¶24

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶25

NIMIT GOYAL /30

Mukesh Vishnoi S/O Shri Rajesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Vishnoi S/O Shri Rajesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramlal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Bhagwan Singh S/O Shri Rugnath Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Chand Jain S/O Shri Khayali Chand Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Chandni Sharma W/O Shri Deepak Dudeja D/O Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijendra Kumar Son of Late Shri Phool Singh Vs Smt. Anita Kumari Wife of Vijendra Kumar

Jagram Urf Pappu Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp