Allowed
Sappi Mohammad S/O Rustam v. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan HCCRLR/2179/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Conviction under Section 138 NI Act with one year imprisonment and fine was challenged by revision. Both parties stated they had compromised and executed a compromise deed; the complainant identified the accused via video conferencing. The revision was allowed, both judgments set aside, and the accused acquitted.
What did the court decide?
Revision accepted; judgments dated 10-09-2020 and 21-10-2021 set aside; accused acquitted on compromise; bail bonds cancelled if not needed elsewhere.