Dismissed

Mujamil S/O Akhlakh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Feb 2025CRLMB/16286/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court order adjourned a bail application twice (initially refused, then set for hearing due to incomplete charge sheet and other pending petitions). The court denied bail provisionally, citing judicial misconduct allegations, pending independent charges against the petitioner, and likely non-cooperation with the CBI. The matter was ultimately disposed of by refusing bail.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed.

Mujamil S/O Akhlakh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 16286/2024

¶3

Mujamil S/o Akhlakh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Sardahedi, Police Station Fatehpur, District Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh. (Presently Accused Confined At Central Jail, Ajmer).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Kumar Gill For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶10

Order

¶11

06/02/2025

¶12

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds vUrxZr viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; izkFkZuk&i= iqfyl Fkkuk&fd'kux<] ftyk&vtesj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 53@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 16@54] 19@54 o 54¼,½ jktLFkku vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e esa tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is”k fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr izFke tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= vuqla/kku iw.kZ ugha gksus rFkk Vsadj ds Lokeh] fidvi ds pkyd o vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k dh fxjQ~rkjh 'ks"k gksus ds dkj.k fnukad 15-10-2024 dks fujLr fd;k x;k FkkA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd iwoZ esa fnukad 15-102024 dks izkFkhZ dk izFke tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr gksus ds ckn vc izkFkhZ ds lEcU/k esa vUos"k.k iw.kZ fd;k tkdj mlds fo:) vkjksi i= izLrqr fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij vfHk;ksx gS fd mlus Vsadj la[;k vkjts 31 thch 1943 dk pkyd gksdj mDr VSadj ds pSEcj ls IykfLVd ds ikbZi ds ek/;e ls ikl [kMh cksysjks xkMh esa j[ks Mªeksa esa fLizV Hkjdj cspus dk iz;kl fd;kA mudk rdZ gS

¶15

[CRLMB-16286/2024]

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

fd ?kVuk ds fnu og mDr okgu dk pkyd ugha Fkk vkSj ekSds ij ugha ik;k x;k Fkk rFkk okgu pkyd ds :i esa fcYVh ij mlds gLrk{kj Hkh ugha gSaA izdj.k esa ,slh dksbZ Hkh lk{; ugha gS] ftlls ;g nf'kZr gksrk gks fd izkFkhZ ?kVuk ds le; okgu dk pkyd gksA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnuakd 6-8-2024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSA mlds fo:) iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr ugha gsA izdj.k eftLVªsV U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.kh; gSA vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% mls tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk,A

¶18

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ml Vsadj dk pkyd Fkk vkSj fLizV pqjkdj nwljs dks ns jgk FkkA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo#) xaHkhj vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA vr% mls tekur dk ykHk ugha fn;k tk,A

¶19

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA iwoZ esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr izFke tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= fnukad 15-10-2024 dks fujLr fd;k x;k FkkA rc rd izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ ugha gqvk FkkA vc izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds lEcU/k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj mlds fo:) vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gSA og fnukad 6-8-2024 ls fujUrj U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA mlds fo:) iwoZ dk dksbZ izdj.k lafLFkr ugha gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% mi;qZDr rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ,oa fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk izLrqr rdksZa ds izdk'k esa] bl Lrj ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶20

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks] rks mls tekur ij eqDr dj fn;k tk,A

¶21

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶22

JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /12

Mujamil S/O Akhlakh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mujamil S/O Akhlakh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankarlal S/O Sh. Ramnath Vs State of Rajasthan

Pushp Chand Vs State and Anr.

Sadhuram S/O Jiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Kumar @ Raju Khatana S/O Shri Krishna Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep S/O Late Shri Ram Dayal Sansi Vs State of Rajasthan

Vasu @ Vatsal S/O Virendra Nagar Vs State of Rajasthan